Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35137149›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2022

Dynamic modeling of hospitalized COVID-19 patients reveals disease state-dependent risk factors.

Braden C Soper, Jose Cadena, Sam Nguyen, Kwan Ho Ryan Chan, Paul Kiszka, Lucas Womack, Mark Work, Joan M Duggan, Steven T Haller, Jennifer A Hanrahan and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Braden C SoperComputing Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.
Jose CadenaEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.
Sam NguyenEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.
Kwan Ho Ryan ChanEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.
Paul KiszkaInformation Technology Services, ProMedica Health System, Inc, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Lucas WomackInformation Technology Services, ProMedica Health System, Inc, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Mark WorkInformation Technology Services, ProMedica Health System, Inc, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Joan M DugganDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Steven T HallerDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Jennifer A HanrahanDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
David J KennedyDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Deepa MukundanDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Priyadip RayEngineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory · USUniversity of Toledo · USMedica (United States) · US

Funding

David and Helen Boone Foundation Research FundLawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program 19-ERD-009The University of Toledo Medical Research SocietyUniversity of Toledo Women and Philanthropy Genetic Analysis Instrumentation Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study sought to investigate the disease state-dependent risk profiles of patient demographics and medical comorbidities associated with adverse outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. MATERIALS AND

methodsA covariate-dependent, continuous-time hidden Markov model with 4 states (moderate, severe, discharged, and deceased) was used to model the dynamic progression of COVID-19 during the course of hospitalization. All model parameters were estimated using the electronic health records of 1362 patients from ProMedica Health System admitted between March 20, 2020 and December 29, 2020 with a positive nasopharyngeal PCR test for SARS-CoV-2. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, and laboratory test results were retrospectively evaluated to infer a patient's clinical progression.

resultsThe association between patient-level covariates and risk of progression was found to be disease state dependent. Specifically, while being male, being Black or having a medical comorbidity were all associated with an increased risk of progressing from the moderate disease state to the severe disease state, these same factors were associated with a decreased risk of progressing from the severe disease state to the deceased state. DISCUSSION: Recent studies have not included analyses of the temporal progression of COVID-19, making the current study a unique modeling-based approach to understand the dynamics of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients.

conclusionDynamic risk stratification models have the potential to improve clinical outcomes not only in COVID-19, but also in a myriad of other acute and chronic diseases that, to date, have largely been assessed only by static modeling techniques.

Indexed as

COVID-19ComorbidityFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19disease progressionhidden Markov modelpatient trajectoryrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35137149
PMCPMC8903413
OpenAlexW4210429413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.