Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35137141›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2022

The effect of breed, sex, and oral meloxicam administration on pain biomarkers following hot-iron branding in Hereford and Angus calves.

Miriam S Martin, Michael D Kleinhenz, Lily N Edwards-Callaway, Terry E Engle, Octavio Guimaraes, David W Schafer, Shawnee R Montgomery, Andrew K Curtis, Mikaela M Weeder, Devin R Jacobs and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of Gender on the Pharmacokinetics of Meloxicam in Sheep.Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Miriam S MartinDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Michael D KleinhenzDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9453-3657
Lily N Edwards-CallawayDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0737-9899
Terry E EngleDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Octavio GuimaraesDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
David W SchaferDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.
Shawnee R MontgomeryDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Andrew K CurtisDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Mikaela M WeederDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Devin R JacobsDepartment of Animal Science, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Johann F CoetzeeDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1802-3991
Kansas State University · USColorado State University · US

Funding

Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive 2017-67015-27124National Institute of Food and Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hot-iron branding uses thermal injury to permanently identify cattle causing painful tissue damage. The primary objective was to examine the physiological and behavioral effects of oral meloxicam (MEL), compared to a control, administered at the time of hot-iron branding in Angus and Hereford steers and heifers. The secondary objectives were to investigate breed and sex effects on pain biomarkers. A total of 70 yearlings, consisting of 35 heifers and 35 steers (Angus, Hereford, or Angus × Hereford), were enrolled in the study. Animals were blocked by sex, randomized across weight, and assigned to receive MEL (1 mg/kg) or a placebo (CON). Biomarkers were assessed for 48 h after branding and included infrared thermography (IRT), mechanical nociceptive threshold (MNT), accelerometry and a visual analog scale (VAS), and serum cortisol and prostaglandin E2 metabolites (PGEM). Wound healing was assessed for 12 wk. Hair samples to quantify cortisol levels were taken prior to and 30 d post-branding. Responses were analyzed using repeated measures with calf nested in treatment as a random effect, and treatment, time, treatment by time interaction, breed, and sex as fixed effects. There was a treatment by time interaction for PGEM (P < 0.01) with MEL having lower values than CON at 6, 24, and 48 h (MEL: 18.34 ± 3.52, 19.61 ± 3.48, and 22.24 ± 3.48 pg/mL, respectively; CON: 32.57 ± 3.58, 37.00 ± 3.52, and 33.07 ± 3.48 pg/mL; P < 0.01). MEL showed less of a difference in maximum IRT values between the branded (2.27 ± 0.29 °C) and control site (3.15 ± 0.29 °C; P < 0.01). MEL took fewer lying bouts at 0-12 h (4.91 bouts ± 0.56) compared with CON (6.87 bouts ± 0.55; P < 0.01). Compared with Hereford calves, Angus calves exhibited greater serum but lower hair cortisol, greater PGEM, more lying bouts, and less healed wound scores at 3, 4, and 5 wk. Compared with heifers, steers exhibited lower PGEM, lower branding site and ocular IRT, higher MNT, and lower plasma meloxicam levels. Steers spent more time lying, took more lying bouts and had greater VAS pain, and more healed wound scores at 5 wk than heifers. Meloxicam administration at branding reduced branding and control site temperature differences and reduced lying bouts for the first 12 h. Breed and sex effects were observed across many biomarkers. Changes from baseline values for IRT, MNT, lying time, step count, VAS pain, and wound scoring all support that branding cattle is painful.

Indexed as

IronPainAnimalsBiomarkersCattleFemaleMeloxicamPain MeasurementBiomarkersIronMeloxicambrandingbreedcattlegenderNSAIDpain

Identifiers

PMID35137141
PMCPMC8919813
OpenAlexW4210827448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.