Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35137133›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2022

Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Decrease Foraging But Not Recruitment After Neonicotinoid Exposure.

Bradley D Ohlinger, Roger Schürch, Sharif Durzi, Parry M Kietzman, Mary R Silliman, Margaret J Couvillon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bradley D OhlingerDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, 216 Price Hall, 170 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3022-6564
Roger SchürchDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, 216 Price Hall, 170 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Sharif DurziDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, 216 Price Hall, 170 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Parry M KietzmanDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, 216 Price Hall, 170 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Mary R SillimanDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, 216 Price Hall, 170 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Margaret J CouvillonDepartment of Entomology, Virginia Tech, 216 Price Hall, 170 Drillfield Drive, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.
Virginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Honey bees (Linnaeus, Hymenoptera: Apidae) are widely used as commercial pollinators and commonly forage in agricultural and urban landscapes containing neonicotinoid-treated plants. Previous research has demonstrated that honey bees display adverse behavioral and cognitive effects after treatment with sublethal doses of neonicotinoids. In laboratory studies, honey bees simultaneously increase their proportional intake of neonicotinoid-treated solutions and decrease their total solution consumption to some concentrations of certain neonicotinoids. These findings suggest that neonicotinoids might elicit a suboptimal response in honey bees, in which they forage preferentially on foods containing pesticides, effectively increasing their exposure, while also decreasing their total food intake; however, behavioral responses in semifield and field conditions are less understood. Here we conducted a feeder experiment with freely flying bees to determine the effects of a sublethal, field-realistic concentration of imidacloprid (IMD) on the foraging and recruitment behaviors of honey bees visiting either a control feeder containing a sucrose solution or a treatment feeder containing the same sucrose solution with IMD. We report that IMD-treated honey bees foraged less frequently (-28%) and persistently (-66%) than control foragers. Recruitment behaviors (dance frequency and dance propensity) also decreased with IMD, but nonsignificantly. Our results suggest that neonicotinoids inhibit honey bee foraging, which could potentially decrease food intake and adversely affect colony health.

Indexed as

Appetitive BehaviorInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsAnimalsBeesNitro CompoundsSucroseInsecticidesNeonicotinoidsNitro CompoundsSucrosecommunicationforagingimidaclopridneonicotinoidwaggle dance

Identifiers

PMID35137133
PMCPMC8826047
OpenAlexW4210996273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.