Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35136980›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2022

Instantaneous neural processing of communicative functions conveyed by speech prosody.

Rosario Tomasello, Luigi Grisoni, Isabella Boux, Daniela Sammler, Friedemann Pulvermüller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A distinct set of brain areas process prosody-the melody of speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Theory of Mind and the brain substrates of direct and indirect communicative action understanding.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Speech Prosody Serves Temporal Prediction of Language via Contextual Entrainment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Development of Left Hemisphere Lateralization for Sentence-Level Prosodic Processing.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Timing in Conversation.Journal of cognition · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rosario TomaselloBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8414-2644
Luigi GrisoniBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Isabella BouxBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4381-2669
Daniela SammlerResearch Group 'Neurocognition of Music and Language', Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7458-0229
Friedemann PulvermüllerBrain Language Laboratory, Department of Philosophy and Humanities, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3210-7112

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During conversations, speech prosody provides important clues about the speaker's communicative intentions. In many languages, a rising vocal pitch at the end of a sentence typically expresses a question function, whereas a falling pitch suggests a statement. Here, the neurophysiological basis of intonation and speech act understanding were investigated with high-density electroencephalography (EEG) to determine whether prosodic features are reflected at the neurophysiological level. Already approximately 100 ms after the sentence-final word differing in prosody, questions, and statements expressed with the same sentences led to different neurophysiological activity recorded in the event-related potential. Interestingly, low-pass filtered sentences and acoustically matched nonvocal musical signals failed to show any neurophysiological dissociations, thus suggesting that the physical intonation alone cannot explain this modulation. Our results show rapid neurophysiological indexes of prosodic communicative information processing that emerge only when pragmatic and lexico-semantic information are fully expressed. The early enhancement of question-related activity compared with statements was due to sources in the articulatory-motor region, which may reflect the richer action knowledge immanent to questions, namely the expectation of the partner action of answering the question. The present findings demonstrate a neurophysiological correlate of prosodic communicative information processing, which enables humans to rapidly detect and understand speaker intentions in linguistic interactions.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansLinguisticscommunicative functionselectroencephalography (EEG)pragmaticsprosodysensorimotor system

Identifiers

PMID35136980
PMCPMC9626830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.