Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35136942›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2023

Optimization of closed-loop electrical stimulation enables robust cerebellar-directed seizure control.

Bethany J Stieve, Thomas J Richner, Chris Krook-Magnuson, Theoden I Netoff, Esther Krook-Magnuson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Full-Stack Architectures for Intelligent Brain-Computer Interfaces.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Antiseizure Networks.Epilepsy currents · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bethany J StieveGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8030-6805
Thomas J RichnerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
Chris Krook-MagnusonDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
Theoden I NetoffGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
Esther Krook-MagnusonGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6119-0165
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Hippobellum: Cerebellar influence on the hippocampus and temporal lobe seizuresR01NS112518 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Esther Krook-Magnuson · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS112518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additional treatment options for temporal lobe epilepsy are needed, and potential interventions targeting the cerebellum are of interest. Previous animal work has shown strong inhibition of hippocampal seizures through on-demand optogenetic manipulation of the cerebellum. However, decades of work examining electrical stimulation-a more immediately translatable approach-targeting the cerebellum has produced very mixed results. We were therefore interested in exploring the impact that stimulation parameters may have on seizure outcomes. Using a mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy, we conducted on-demand electrical stimulation of the cerebellar cortex, and varied stimulation charge, frequency and pulse width, resulting in over 1000 different potential combinations of settings. To explore this parameter space in an efficient, data-driven, manner, we utilized Bayesian optimization with Gaussian process regression, implemented in MATLAB with an Expected Improvement Plus acquisition function. We examined three different fitting conditions and two different electrode orientations. Following the optimization process, we conducted additional on-demand experiments to test the effectiveness of selected settings. Regardless of experimental setup, we found that Bayesian optimization allowed identification of effective intervention settings. Additionally, generally similar optimal settings were identified across animals, suggesting that personalized optimization may not always be necessary. While optimal settings were effective, stimulation with settings predicted from the Gaussian process regression to be ineffective failed to provide seizure control. Taken together, our results provide a blueprint for exploration of a large parameter space for seizure control and illustrate that robust inhibition of seizures can be achieved with electrical stimulation of the cerebellum, but only if the correct stimulation parameters are used.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationEpilepsy, Temporal LobeAnimalsBayes TheoremCerebellumElectric StimulationSeizuresDBSneuromodulationpersonalized medicineresponsive neurostimulationsearch algorithm

Identifiers

PMID35136942
PMCPMC10202393
OpenAlexW4210748320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.