Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35136676›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022

Outcome and Biomarker Supervised Deep Learning for Survival Prediction in Two Multicenter Breast Cancer Series.

Dmitrii Bychkov, Heikki Joensuu, Stig Nordling, Aleksei Tiulpin, Hakan Kücükel, Mikael Lundin, Harri Sihto, Jorma Isola, Tiina Lehtimäki, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Dmitrii BychkovInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Heikki JoensuuiCAN Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Program, Helsinki, Finland.
Stig NordlingDepartment of Pathology, Medicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Aleksei TiulpinResearch Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Hakan KücükelInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mikael LundinInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Harri SihtoDepartment of Pathology, Medicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Jorma IsolaDepartment of Cancer Biology, BioMediTech, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Tiina LehtimäkiHelsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-LehtinenDepartment of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Karl von SmittenEira Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Johan LundinInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Nina LinderInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FIHelsinki University Hospital · FIOulu University Hospital · FITampere University · FITampere University Hospital · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrediction of clinical outcomes for individual cancer patients is an important step in the disease diagnosis and subsequently guides the treatment and patient counseling. In this work, we develop and evaluate a joint outcome and biomarker supervised (estrogen receptor expression and MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing deep learning, we trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with digitized tissue microarray (TMA) samples of primary hematoxylin-eosin-stained breast cancer specimens from 693 patients in the FinProg series as input and breast cancer-specific survival as the endpoint. The trained algorithms were tested on 354 TMA patient samples in the same series. An independent set of whole-slide (WS) tumor samples from 674 patients in another multicenter study (FinHer) was used to validate and verify the generalization of the outcome prediction based on CNN models by Cox survival regression and concordance index (c-index). Visual cancer tissue characterization, i.e., number of mitoses, tubules, nuclear pleomorphism, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and necrosis was performed on TMA samples in the FinProg test set by a pathologist and combined with deep learning-based outcome prediction in a multitask algorithm.

resultsThe multitask algorithm achieved a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-3.00),

conclusionsA multitask deep learning algorithm supervised by both patient outcome and biomarker status learned features in basic tissue morphology predictive of survival in a nationwide, multicenter series of patients with breast cancer. The algorithms generalized to another independent multicenter patient series and whole-slide breast cancer samples and provide prognostic information complementary to that of a comprehensive series of established prognostic factors.

Indexed as

Breast cancerconvolutional neural networksdigital pathologyERBB2 geneestrogen receptormultitask deep learningoutcome prediction

Identifiers

PMID35136676
PMCPMC8794033
OpenAlexW4206738998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.