Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35136672›Full record

ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2022

An Expandable Informatics Framework for Enhancing Central Cancer Registries with Digital Pathology Specimens, Computational Imaging Tools, and Advanced Mining Capabilities.

David J Foran, Eric B Durbin, Wenjin Chen, Evita Sadimin, Ashish Sharma, Imon Banerjee, Tahsin Kurc, Nan Li, Antoinette M Stroup, Gerald Harris and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

David J ForanCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Eric B DurbinKentucky Cancer Registry, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Wenjin ChenCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Evita SadiminCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Ashish SharmaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Imon BanerjeeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tahsin KurcDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Nan LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Antoinette M StroupNew Jersey State Cancer Registry, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Gerald HarrisNew Jersey State Cancer Registry, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Annie GuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Maria SchymuraNew York State Cancer Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, USA.
Rajarsi GuptaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Erich BremerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Joseph BalsamoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Tammy DiPrimaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Feiqiao WangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Shahira AbousamraDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Dimitris SamarasDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Isaac HandsDivision of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Kevin WardGeorgia State Cancer Registry, Georgia Department of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Joel H SaltzDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
TCIA Sustainment and Scalability - Platforms for Quantitative Imaging Informatics in Precision MedicineU24CA215109 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BANERJEE, IMON, PRIOR, FRED WILLIAM · 2017 to 2021
$8.5M
Methods and Tools for Integrating Pathomics Data into Cancer RegistriesUH3CA225021 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI CLIFFORD, GARI DAVID, DURBIN, ERIC B. · 2020 to 2022
$1.9M
Methods and Tools for Integrating Pathomics Data into Cancer RegistriesUG3CA225021 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI DURBIN, ERIC B., FORAN, DAVID J · 2018 to 2019
$815k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NCI NIH HHS U24 CA215109NCI NIH HHS UG3 CA225021NCI NIH HHS UH3 CA225021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation-based state cancer registries are an authoritative source for cancer statistics in the United States. They routinely collect a variety of data, including patient demographics, primary tumor site, stage at diagnosis, first course of treatment, and survival, on every cancer case that is reported across all U.S. states and territories. The goal of our project is to enrich NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry data with high-quality population-based biospecimen data in the form of digital pathology, machine-learning-based classifications, and quantitative histopathology imaging feature sets (referred to here as MATERIALS AND

methodsAs part of the project, the underlying informatics infrastructure was designed, tested, and implemented through close collaboration with several participating SEER registries to ensure consistency with registry processes, computational scalability, and ability to support creation of population cohorts that span multiple sites. Utilizing computational imaging algorithms and methods to both generate indices and search for matches makes it possible to reduce inter- and intra-observer inconsistencies and to improve the objectivity with which large image repositories are interrogated.

resultsOur team has created and continues to expand a well-curated repository of high-quality digitized pathology images corresponding to subjects whose data are routinely collected by the collaborating registries. Our team has systematically deployed and tested key, visual analytic methods to facilitate automated creation of population cohorts for epidemiological studies and tools to support visualization of feature clusters and evaluation of whole-slide images. As part of these efforts, we are developing and optimizing advanced search and matching algorithms to facilitate automated, content-based retrieval of digitized specimens based on their underlying image features and staining characteristics.

conclusionTo meet the challenges of this project, we established the analytic pipelines, methods, and workflows to support the expansion and management of a growing repository of high-quality digitized pathology and information-rich, population cohorts containing objective imaging and clinical attributes to facilitate studies that seek to discriminate among different subtypes of disease, stratify patient populations, and perform comparisons of tumor characteristics within and across patient cohorts. We have also successfully developed a suite of tools based on a deep-learning method to perform quantitative characterizations of tumor regions, assess infiltrating lymphocyte distributions, and generate objective nuclear feature measurements. As part of these efforts, our team has implemented reliable methods that enable investigators to systematically search through large repositories to automatically retrieve digitized pathology specimens and correlated clinical data based on their computational signatures.

Indexed as

Cancer registriescomputational imagingdeep-learningdigital pathology

Identifiers

PMID35136672
PMCPMC8794027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.