Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35136573›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2021

Novel antifungal agents in clinical trials.

Samantha E Jacobs, Panagiotis Zagaliotis, Thomas J Walsh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Compromising UDP-sugar nucleotide biosynthesis attenuatesCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  3. Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Repositioning Antimicrobial Peptides Against WHO-Priority Fungi.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Managing Invasive Fungal Infections During Allogeneic Hematopoietic Transplantation: A 2025 Update.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Identification of Potent and Selective Inhibitors ofJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Samantha E JacobsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10029-5674, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9770-886X
Panagiotis ZagaliotisTransplantation-Oncology Infectious Diseases Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Thomas J WalshTransplantation-Oncology Infectious Diseases Program, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4142-8711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive fungal diseases due to resistant yeasts and molds are an important and increasing public health threat, likely due to a growing population of immunosuppressed hosts, increases in antifungal resistance, and improvements in laboratory diagnostics.  The significant morbidity and mortality associated with these pathogens bespeaks the urgent need for novel safe and effective therapeutics.  This review highlights promising investigational antifungal agents in clinical phases of development: fosmanogepix, ibrexafungerp, rezafungin, encochleated amphotericin B, oteseconazole (VT-1161), VT-1598, PC945, and olorofim.  We discuss three first-in-class members of three novel antifungal classes, as well as new agents within existing antifungal classes with improved safety and tolerability profiles due to enhanced pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsDrug Resistance, FungalFungiImmunocompromised HostAntifungal AgentsAntifungal Agentsclinical trialsnovel treatmentspharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic

Identifiers

PMID35136573
PMCPMC8787557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.