Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35136559›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Toward a conceptual framework for managing and conserving marine habitats: A case study of kelp forests in the Salish Sea.

Jordan A Hollarsmith, Kelly Andrews, Nicole Naar, Samuel Starko, Max Calloway, Adam Obaza, Emily Buckner, Daniel Tonnes, James Selleck, Thomas W Therriault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Historical data reveal extirpation of foundation species and kelp forest community deborealization in a coastal hotspot.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Microclimate predicts kelp forest extinction in the face of direct and indirect marine heatwave effects.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jordan A HollarsmithAlaska Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8758-9801
Kelly AndrewsConservation Biology Division Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7734-3800
Nicole NaarWashington Sea Grant College of the Environment University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6803-857X
Samuel StarkoDepartment of Biology University of Victoria Victoria British Columbia Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9604-9188
Max CallowayAquatic Resources Division Washington Department of Natural Resources Nearshore Habitat Program Olympia Washington USA.
Adam ObazaPaua Marine Research Group San Diego California USA.
Emily BucknerWashington Sea Grant College of the Environment University of Washington Seattle Washington USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7741-0919
Daniel TonnesWest Coast Region National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington USA.
James SelleckWest Coast Region National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Seattle Washington USA.
Thomas W TherriaultPacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada Nanaimo British Columbia Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kelp forests are in decline across much of their range due to place-specific combinations of local and global stressors. Declines in kelp abundance can lead to cascading losses of biodiversity and productivity with far-reaching ecological and socioeconomic consequences. The Salish Sea is a hotspot of kelp diversity where many species of kelp provide critical habitat and food for commercially, ecologically, and culturally important fish and invertebrate species. However, like other regions, kelp forests in much of the Salish Sea are in rapid decline. Data gaps and limited long-term monitoring have hampered attempts to identify and manage for specific drivers of decline, despite the documented urgency to protect these important habitats. To address these knowledge gaps, we gathered a focus group of experts on kelp in the Salish Sea to identify perceived direct and indirect stressors facing kelp forests. We then conducted a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed studies from the Salish Sea and temperate coastal ecosystems worldwide to assess the level of support for the pathways identified by the experts, and we identified knowledge gaps to prioritize future research. Our results revealed major research gaps within the Salish Sea and highlighted the potential to use expert knowledge for making informed decisions in the region. We found high support for the pathways in the global literature, with variable consensus on the relationship between stressors and responses across studies, confirming the influence of local ecological, oceanographic, and anthropogenic contexts and threshold effects on stressor-response relationships. Finally, we prioritized areas for future research in the Salish Sea. This study demonstrates the value expert opinion has to inform management decisions. These methods are readily adaptable to other ecosystem management contexts, and the results of this case study can be immediately applied to kelp management.

Indexed as

Drivers–Pressures–State–Impact–Responseecosystem‐based managementglobal changelocal ecological knowledgePuget Soundresource management

Identifiers

PMID35136559
PMCPMC8809449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.