Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35136389›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Integrated People-Centred Care in Canada - Policies, Standards, and Implementation Tools to Improve Outcomes.

Patricia Sullivan-Taylor, Esther Suter, Samantha Laxton, Nelly D Oelke, Emma Park

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Better Healthcare Together: Co-Designing a Framework for Health Service Co-Design.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. From Integrated Care to Learning Systems.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Patricia Sullivan-TaylorStrategic Policy and Partner Engagement, Health Standards Organization (HSO), Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4118-0004
Esther SuterFaculty of Social Work, University of Calgary, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6198-2667
Samantha LaxtonHealth Standards Organization (HSO), Canada.
Nelly D OelkeSchool of Nursing, University of British Columbia, and Scientific Director, Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia, Adjunct Faculty, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1666-5360
Emma ParkHealth Standards Organization (HSO), Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7807-6975
Research Design And Standards Organization · INCanadian Standards Association · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite the national and international policy commitment to implement integrated health systems, there is an absence of national standards that support evidence-based design, implementation, and monitoring for improvement. Health Standards Organization (HSO)'s CAN/HSO 76000:2021 - DESCRIPTION: The IPCHS standard is built around 10 design principles with detailed, action-oriented criteria and guidance for policy makers and health system partners. The IPCHS standard was co-designed with a technical committee that included balanced representation of policy makers, health system decision-makers, Indigenous leaders, providers, patients, caregivers, and academics. Additional feedback was received from a diverse audience during two public review periods and targeted consultation via interviews. This qualitative feedback, combined with the evidence reviews completed by the technical committee, informed the final content of the IPCHS standard. DISCUSSION: The IPCHS standard was developed through a co-design process and complements existing frameworks by providing 66 detailed, action-oriented criteria, with specific guidance. The co-design process and consultations resulted in increased awareness and capacity among policy makers and health system partners. Supplementary tools are also in development to facilitate implementation and monitoring of progress and outcomes. This manuscript was developed in collaboration with technical committee members and HSO staff who led the targeted consultation and adoption of the IPCHS standard in six integrated care networks.

conclusionImplementing integration strategies requires that we create and sustain a culture of continuous improvement and learning. Key lessons from the development process focused on the importance of co-design, embedding people-centred practices throughout the standard, formal yet iterative methodology inclusive of broad consultation, clear accountability for both policy makers and system partners, tools that support action and can be adapted to local context and level of integrated system maturity.

Indexed as

co-designhealth systems integrationintegrated carepeople-centredpolicystandards

Identifiers

PMID35136389
PMCPMC8815438
OpenAlexW4210696385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.