Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35136369›Full record

ArticleFood technology and biotechnology2021

Increased Survival of

Aurore Bodzen, Audrey Jossier, Sébastien Dupont, Pierre-Yves Mousset, Laurent Beney, Sophie Lafay, Patrick Gervais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food technology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Evaluation of the Probiotic Properties ofFood technology and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aurore BodzenUniversity of Burgundy, AgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102, 21000 Dijon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2462-6871
Audrey JossierUniversity of Burgundy, AgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102, 21000 Dijon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7419-8414
Sébastien DupontUniversity of Burgundy, AgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102, 21000 Dijon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3737-3500
Pierre-Yves MoussetIndigo Therapeutics, 5 rue Salneuve, 75017 Paris, France.
Laurent BeneyUniversity of Burgundy, AgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102, 21000 Dijon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2757-2506
Sophie LafayIndigo Therapeutics, 5 rue Salneuve, 75017 Paris, France.
Patrick GervaisUniversity of Burgundy, AgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102, 21000 Dijon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4863-7671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RESEARCH

backgroundFreeze-drying is the most widely used dehydration process in the food industry for the stabilization of bacteria. Studies have shown the effectiveness of an acid prestress in increasing the resistance of lactic acid bacteria to freeze-drying. Adaptation of bacteria to an acid stress is based on maintaining the properties of the plasma membrane. Indeed, the fatty acid composition of the membrane of lactic acid bacteria is often changed after an acid prestress. However, few studies have measured membrane fluidity after an acid stress during lactic acid bacterial strain cultivation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: In order to use two pH profiles, the strains RESULTS AND

conclusionsCultivation under more acidic conditions significantly increased the survival during freeze-drying (p<0.05, ANOVA) of both strains. Moreover, in both strains of NOVELTY AND SCIENTIFIC CONTRIBUTION: A better understanding of the involvement of membrane properties, especially of membrane fluidity, in bacterial resistance to dehydration is provided in this study.

Indexed as

acid prestressfreeze-dryingLactococcus lactismembrane fluidityviability

Identifiers

PMID35136369
PMCPMC8753807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.