Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35136289›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India

Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer - Current status.

Shrikanth Atluri, Ali Mouzannar, Vivek Venkatramani, Dipen J Parekh, Bruno Nahar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07011342 (Utility of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer After Focal Gland Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07011342 narecruitingnot on this map

Utility of 18F-rhPSMA-7.3 in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer After Focal Gland Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorHackensack Meridian HealthRan2025 to 2028Enrolled70ConditionsProstate CancerArms18F-rhPSMA-7.3
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shrikanth AtluriDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Ali MouzannarDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Vivek VenkatramaniDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Dipen J ParekhDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Bruno NaharDepartment of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal therapy (FT) has recently gained popularity for the treatment of localized prostate cancer (PCa). FT achieves cancer control by targeting the lesions or the regions of the cancer and avoids damage to the surrounding tissues thus minimizing side effects which are common to the radical treatment, such as urinary continence and sexual function, and bowel-related side effects. Various ablative methods are used to deliver energy to the cancerous tissue. We review the different modalities of treatment and the current state of FT for PCa.

Identifiers

PMID35136289
PMCPMC8796757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.