ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2023
Testicular pain and youtube™: are uploaded videos a reliable source to get information?
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The quality and reliability of short videos about myocardial infarction on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Is YouTube™ a Reliable Source of Information for the Current Use of HIPEC in the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer?Cancers · 2025Review
- Social Media and Men's Health: Separating Science from Speculation in Andrology.Basic and clinical andrology · 2025Review
- The spreading information of YouTube videos on Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors: a worrisome picture from one of the most consulted internet source.International journal of impotence research · 2024Article
- Social media and urology: The good, the bad and the ugly.Urologia · 2024Review
- Assessment and Acquisition of Knowledge Regarding Urinary Tract Infection Among Adult Women in the United States.Urology · 2024Article
- Users' experience with health-related content on YouTube: an exploratory study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Assessment of quality, absorbability, and educational value of YouTube videos regarding ankle fractures.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Mental Health of Prostate Cancer Patients: Content Review on YouTubeInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Social Media Content on Immunology: Is an Assessment by the Scientific Community Required?Vaccines · 2023Article
- Immunotherapy for Urological Tumors on YouTubeVaccines · 2022Article
- Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos as an Information Source for Testicular Torsion.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several previous studies on YouTube™ on urological field have already been published. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the quality information of YouTube
Indexed as
Identifiers
35136203What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.