Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35136199›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2022

Pediatric central venous access devices: practice, performance, and costs.

Amanda J Ullman, Victoria Gibson, Mari D Takashima, Tricia M Kleidon, Jessica Schults, Masnoon Saiyed, Paula Cattanach, Rebecca Paterson, Marie Cooke, Claire M Rickard and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Central venous access device-associated complication costs in paediatric cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Michigan appropriateness guide for intravenous catheters in pediatrics - miniMAGIC-Brasil: translation into Brazilian portuguese.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2024
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Amanda J UllmanSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. a.ullman@uq.edu.au.
Victoria GibsonQueensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Mari D TakashimaMenzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Tricia M KleidonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Jessica SchultsQueensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Masnoon SaiyedMenzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Paula CattanachQueensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Rebecca PatersonMenzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Marie CookeMenzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Claire M RickardSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Joshua ByrnesMenzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Vineet ChopraMenzies Health Institute Queensland and School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealthcare delivery is reliant on a functional central venous access device (CVAD), but the knowledge surrounding the burden of pediatric CVAD-associated harm is limited.

methodsA prospective cohort study at a tertiary-referral pediatric hospital in Australia. Children <18 years undergoing insertion of a CVAD were screened from the operating theatre and intensive care unit records, then assessed bi-weekly for up to 3 months. Outcomes were CVAD failure and complications, and associated healthcare costs (cost of complications).

results163 patients with 200 CVADs were recruited and followed for 6993 catheter days, with peripherally inserted central catheters most common (n = 119; 60%). CVAD failure occurred in 20% of devices (n = 30; 95% CI: 15-26), at an incidence rate (IR) of 5.72 per 1000 catheter days (95% CI: 4.09-7.78). CVAD complications were evident in 43% of all CVADs (n = 86; 95% CI: 36-50), at a rate of 12.29 per 1000 catheter days (95% CI: 9.84-15.16). CVAD failure costs were A$826 per episode, and A$165,372 per 1000 CVADs. Comparisons between current and recommended practice revealed inconsistent use of ultrasound guidance for insertion, sub-optimal tip-positioning, and appropriate device selection.

conclusionsCVAD complications and failures represent substantial burdens to children and healthcare. Future efforts need to focus on the inconsistent use of best practices. IMPACT: Current surveillance of central venous access device (CVAD) performance is likely under-estimating actual burden on pediatric patients and the healthcare system. CVAD failure due to complication was evident in 20% of CVADs. Costs associated with CVAD complications average at $2327 (AUD, 2020) per episode. Further investment in key diverse practice areas, including new CVAD types, CVAD pathology-based occlusion and dislodgment strategies, the appropriate use of device types, and tip-positioning technologies, will likely lead to extensive benefit.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheterization, PeripheralCentral Venous CathetersAustraliaChildHumansIncidenceProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35136199
PMCPMC9700519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.