ArticleScientific reports2022
Directional analysis of intensity changes for determining the existence of cyst in optical coherence tomography images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyst identification in retinal optical coherence tomography images using hidden Markov model.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is an important cause of blindness in people with the long history of diabetes. DR is caused due to the damage to blood vessels in the retina. One of the most important manifestations of DR is the formation of fluid-filled regions between retinal layers. The evaluation of stage and transcribed drugs can be possible through the analysis of retinal Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) images. Therefore, the detection of cysts in OCT images and the is of considerable importance. In this paper, a fast method is proposed to determine the status of OCT images as cystic or non-cystic. The method consists of three phases which are pre-processing, boundary pixel determination and post-processing. After applying a noise reduction method in the pre-processing step, the method finds the pixels which are the boundary pixels of cysts. This process is performed by finding the significant intensity changes in the vertical direction and considering rectangular patches around the candidate pixels. The patches are verified whether or not they contain enough pixels making considerable diagonal intensity changes. Then, a shadow omission method is proposed in the post-processing phase to extract the shadow regions which can be mistakenly considered as cystic areas. Then, the pixels extracted in the previous phase that are near the shadow regions are removed to prevent the production of false positive cases. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated in terms of sensitivity and specificity on real datasets. The experimental results show that the proposed method produces outstanding results from both accuracy and speed points of view.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.