ReviewJournal of neurointerventional surgery2022
Technical considerations and tips for using the Tegus remote proctoring system in elective and emergency cases and in webinars.
Review in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remote Teleproctoring with the TEGUS System for Mechanical Thrombectomy in a Non-Comprehensive Stroke Center: Initial Preliminary Data On Clinical Experience.Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Article
- First Experience of Treatment of Multiple Shrapnel Traumatic Pseudoaneurysms During the War in Ukraine Using Tegus Telemedical System.Clinical neuroradiology · 2024Article
- School of Thrombectomy-A 3-Step Approach to Perform Acute Stroke Treatment with Simulator Training and Virtual Supervision by Remote Streaming Support (RESS).Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smart angiography suites (SAS) refer to the incorporation of audio-video technology and internet connectivity into the angiography suite to enable bidirectional communication for teleproctoring. Remote streaming support (RESS) is intended to increase patient safety by supporting interventionalists with limited experience or who are practicing in geographically remote areas. The aim of this review is to describe real-life experience of the Tegus system and to share practical tips concerning its use and setup. We describe the platform itself, settings and integration in our angiography suite. We provide technical tips intended to help new and potential users to achieve an optimal experience for both neurointerventionalists and proctors. We describe both elective cases that we have performed with teleproctoring and emergencies. Lastly, we describe a different room setup and software solutions used in live workshops. Use of teleproctoring enabled involvement of proctors in cases where an already experienced interventionalist needed support in the decision-making process concerning the sizing and deployment of devices with which he was familiar only on a basic level. Excellent video feed quality and instant communication enabled optimal preparation and in vivo implantation of those devices without the need for physical proctors' presence. In emergency cases the system allowed a senior physician to offer support during cases where optimal device sizing is critical. Our usage concept of the rig permitted monitoring of thrombectomy cases by junior physicians. During webinars a remote streaming platform enabled us to conduct workshops that simulated an "on-site" experience as closely as possible during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.