Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35135763›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Effect of a multifaceted intervention on the utilisation of primary health for maternal and child health care in rural Nigeria: a quasi-experimental study.

Friday Okonofua, Lorretta Favour Ntoimo, Sanni Yaya, Brian Igboin, Ojuolape Solanke, Chioma Ekwo, Ermel Ameswue Kpogbe Johnson, Issiaka Sombie, Wilson Imongan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Friday OkonofuaWomen's Health and Action Research Centre, Benin City, Nigeria feokonofua@yahoo.co.uk.
Lorretta Favour NtoimoWomen's Health and Action Research Centre, Benin City, Nigeria.ORCID 0000-0002-3218-5535
Sanni YayaSchool of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Brian IgboinWomen's Health and Action Research Centre, Benin City, Nigeria.
Ojuolape SolankeFederal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria.
Chioma EkwoWomen's Health and Action Research Centre, Benin City, Nigeria.
Ermel Ameswue Kpogbe JohnsonWest African Health Organisation, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0003-3663-5174
Issiaka SombieWest African Health Organisation, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Wilson ImonganWomen's Health and Action Research Centre, Benin City, Nigeria.
Social Action · NGWest African Health Organisation · BFFederal Ministry of Health · NGUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a set of multifaceted interventions designed to increase the access of rural women to antenatal, intrapartum, postpartum and childhood immunisation services offered in primary healthcare facilities.

designThe study was a separate sample pretest-post-test quasi-experimental research.

settingThe research was conducted in 20 communities and primary health centres in Esan South East and Etsako East Local Government Areas in Edo State in southern Nigeria

participantsRandomly selected sample of ever married women aged 15-45 years.

interventionsSeven community-led interventions implemented over 27 months, consisting of a community health fund, engagement of transport owners on emergency transport of pregnant women to primary health centres with the use of rapid short message service (SMS), drug revolving fund, community education, advocacy, retraining of health workers and provision of basic equipment. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures included the number of women who used the primary health centres for skilled pregnancy care and immunisation of children aged 0-23 months.

resultsAfter adjusting for clustering and confounding variables, the odds of using the project primary healthcare centres for the four outcomes were significantly higher at endline compared with baseline: antenatal care (OR 3.87, CI 2.84 to 5.26 p<0.001), delivery care (OR 3.88, CI 2.86 to 5.26), postnatal care (OR 3.66, CI 2.58 to 5.18) and childhood immunisation (OR 2.87, CI 1.90 to 4.33). However, a few women still reported that the cost of services and gender-related issues were reasons for non-use after the intervention.

conclusionWe conclude that community-led interventions that address the specific concerns of women related to the bottlenecks they experience in accessing care in primary health centres are effective in increasing demand for skilled pregnancy and childcare in rural Nigeria.

Indexed as

Child HealthMaternal Health ServicesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedNigeriaPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareRural PopulationYoung Adultantenatalcommunity child healthmaternal medicinepaediatric infectious disease & immunisationprimary carereproductive medicine

Identifiers

PMID35135763
PMCPMC8830217
OpenAlexW4210911458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.