Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35135632›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2022

'Making the most of together time': development of a Health Visitor-led intervention to support children's early language and communication development at the 2-2½-year-old review.

Cristina McKean, Rose Watson, Jenna Charlton, Sue Roulstone, Caitlin Holme, Victoria Gilroy, James Law

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina McKeanNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. cristina.mckean@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9058-9813
Rose WatsonNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jenna CharltonNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sue RoulstoneBristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Caitlin HolmeBristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Victoria GilroyInstitute of Health Visiting, London, UK.
James LawNewcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBInstitute of Health Visiting · GBNewcastle College · GB

Funding

phe n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly interventions to support young children's language development through responsive parent-child interaction have proven efficacy but are not currently delivered universally. A potential universal delivery platform is the Health Visitor (HV)-led 2-2½-year-old review in England's Healthy Child Programme. It is unclear if it is feasible to offer such interventions through this platform. We report an intervention development process, including extensive stakeholder consultation and co-design which aimed to develop an acceptable, feasible and equitable early language intervention for delivery in this context.

methodsThe study involved five phases including 13 stakeholder co-design workshops with 7 parents and 39 practitioners (HVs, early years practitioners and speech and language therapists): (1) Identification of existing intervention evidence, (2) qualitative review of intervention studies extracting candidate target behaviours for intervention and intervention techniques, (3) co-design workshops with parents and practitioners examining acceptability, barriers and enablers to those behaviours and techniques (particular attention was paid to diverse family circumstances and the range of barriers which might exist), (4) findings were analysed using COM-B and theoretical domains frameworks and a prototype intervention model designed, and (5) co-design workshops iteratively refined the proposed model.

resultsPractitioners were committed to offering language intervention at the 2-2½-year-old review but were not sure precisely how to do so. Parents/caregivers wanted to be proactive and to have agency in supporting their own children and to do this as soon as possible. For equitable intervention, it must be proportionate, with higher 'intensity' for higher levels of disadvantage, and tailored, offering differing approaches considering the specific barriers and enablers, assets and challenges in each family. The importance and potential fragility of alliances between parent/caregiver and practitioner were identified as key, and so, strategies to engender successful collaborative partnership are also embedded in intervention design.

conclusionIt is possible to develop a universal intervention which parents and practitioners judge would be acceptable, feasible and equitable for use at the 2-2½-year review to promote children's language development. The result is one of the most explicitly developed universal interventions to promote children's language development. Further development and piloting is required to develop materials to support successful widespread implementation.

Indexed as

COM-B modelImplementation scienceIntervention developmentIntervention equityLanguage developmentPreventative interventionShared decision-makingTailored interventionYoung children

Identifiers

PMID35135632
PMCPMC8822642
OpenAlexW4211251386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.