Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35135559›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2022

Layering contrasting photoselective filters improves the simulation of foliar shade.

Dominic P Petrella, Florence Breuillin-Sessoms, Eric Watkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominic P PetrellaDepartment of Horticultural Science, Univ. of Minnesota, 1970 Folwell Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA. petrella.21@osu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-5013
Florence Breuillin-SessomsDepartment of Horticultural Science, Univ. of Minnesota, 1970 Folwell Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9009-0841
Eric WatkinsDepartment of Horticultural Science, Univ. of Minnesota, 1970 Folwell Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7225-1747
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-51181-27222
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeutral density shade cloth is commonly used for simulating foliar shade, in which it reduces light intensity without altering spectral quality. However, foliar shade also alters spectral quality, reducing the ratio of red to far-red (R:FR) light, altering the ratio of blue to green (B:G) light, and reducing ultraviolet light. Unlike shade cloth, photoselective filters can alter spectral quality, but the filters used in previous literature have not simulated foliar shade well. We examined the spectral quality of sunlight under color temperature blue (CTB), plus green (PG), and neutral density (ND) filters from LEE Filters, Rosco e-colour + and Cinegel brands either alone or layered, hypothesizing that the contrasting filter qualities would improve simulations. As a proof-of-concept, we collected spectral data under foliar shade to compare to data collected under photoselective filters.

resultsUnder foliar shade reductions in the R:FR ratio ranged from 0.11 to 0.54 (~ 1.18 in full sun), while reductions in the B:G ratio were as low as 0.53 in deep shade, or were as high as 1.11 in moderate shade (~ 0.87 in full sun). Neutral density filters led to near-neutral reductions in photosynthetically active radiation and reduced the R:FR ratio similar to foliar shade. Color temperature blue filters simulated the increased B:G ratio observed under moderate foliar shade, but did not reduce the R:FR ratio low enough. On their own, PG filters did not simulate any type of foliar shade. Different brands of the same filter type also had disparate effects on spectral quality. Layered CTB and ND filters improved the accuracy of moderate foliar shade simulations, and layering CTB, PG, and ND filters led to accurate simulations of deep foliar shade.

conclusionsLayering photoselective filters with contrasting effects on the spectral quality of sunlight results in more accurate simulations of foliar shade compared to when these filters are used separately. Layered filters can re-create the spectral motifs of moderate and deep foliar shade; they could be used to simulate shade scenarios found in different cropping systems. Photoselective filters offer numerous advantages over neutral density shade cloth and could be a direct replacement for researchers currently using neutral density shade cloth.

Indexed as

B:G ratioFoliar shadePhotoselective filterR:FR ratioSimulationSpectral photon distribution

Identifiers

PMID35135559
PMCPMC8822638
OpenAlexW4225467093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.