Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35135521›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2022

Acceptability and feasibility of video-based coaching to enhance clinicians' communication skills with patients.

Jennifer Freytag, Jinna Chu, Sylvia J Hysong, Richard L Street, Christine M Markham, Thomas P Giordano, Robert A Westbrook, Sarah Njue-Marendes, Syundai R Johnson, Bich N Dang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer FreytagVA Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Houston, USA.
Jinna ChuBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA.
Sylvia J HysongVA Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Houston, USA.
Richard L StreetVA Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Houston, USA.
Christine M MarkhamUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, USA.
Thomas P GiordanoVA Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Houston, USA.
Robert A WestbrookJesse H. Jones Graduate School of Business, Rice University, Houston, USA. westbro@rice.edu.
Sarah Njue-MarendesVA Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Houston, USA.
Syundai R JohnsonVA Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Houston, USA.
Bich N DangVA Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Houston, USA.
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USCenter for Innovation · USBaylor College of Medicine · USRice University · USTexas A&M University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

REFINEMENT AND PILOT TESTING OF A HIGHLY INNOVATIVE PROVIDER COACHING AND FEEDBACK INTERVENTION TO IMPROVE THE PATIENT HIV CARE EXPERIENCER21MH115756 · NIMH · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DANG, BICH NGOC · 2018 to 2019
$445k
NIMH NIH HHS 5R21MH115756-02NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH115756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite a growing call to train clinicians in interpersonal communication skills, communication training is either not offered or is minimally effective, if at all. A critical need exists to develop new ways of teaching communication skills that are effective and mindful of clinician time pressures. We propose a program that includes real-time observation and video-based coaching to teach clinician communication skills. In this study, we assess acceptability and feasibility of the program using clinician interviews and surveys.

methodsThe video-based coaching intervention targets five patient-centered communication behaviors. It uses trained communication coaches and live feed technology to provide coaching that is brief (less than 15 min), timely (same day) and theory-informed. Two coaches were trained to set up webcams and observe live video feeds of clinician visits in rooms nearby. As coaches watched and recorded the visit, they time stamped illustrative clips in real time. Video clips were a critical element of the program. During feedback sessions, coaches used video clips to promote discussion and self-reflection. They also used role play and guided practice techniques to enforce new tips. Clinicians included residents (n = 15), fellows (n = 4), attending physicians (n = 3), and a nurse practitioner (n = 1) at two primary care clinics in Houston, Texas. We administered surveys to clinicians participating in the program. The survey included questions on quality and delivery of feedback, and credibility of the coaches. We also interviewed clinicians following the intervention. We used rapid analysis to identify themes within the interviews.

resultsSurvey measures showed high feasibility and acceptability ratings from clinicians, with mean item scores ranging from 6.4 to 6.8 out of 7 points. Qualitative analysis revealed that clinicians found that 1) coaches were credible and supportive, 2) feedback was useful, 3) video-clips allowed for self-reflection, 4) getting feedback on the same day was useful, and 5) use of real patients preferred over standardized patients.

conclusionsVideo-based coaching can help clinicians learn new communication skills in a way that is clinician-centered, brief and timely. Our study demonstrates that real-time coaching using live feed and video technology is an acceptable and feasible way of teaching communication skills.

Indexed as

MentoringCommunicationFeasibility StudiesFeedbackHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesFeedbackPatient-clinician communicationVideo coaching

Identifiers

PMID35135521
PMCPMC8822679
OpenAlexW4210829147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.