ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022
Endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical debridement combined with posterior fixation and fusion for the treatment of upper cervical spine tuberculosis: a retrospective feasibility study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Progress in diagnosis and treatment of primary spondylodiscitis: a systematic literature review.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- Sagittal Parameters and Clinical Outcomes in Cervical Spondylitis: The Cohort Analysis.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Case report of minimally invasive spinal endoscopic debridement and pedicle screw fixation for severe spinal infection of the lumbosacral spine.North American Spine Society journal · 2024Article
- Surgical Management of Spinal Tuberculosis-The Past, Present, and Future.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis retrospective study aimed to determine the feasibility and efficacy of endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical debridement combined with posterior fixation and fusion in patients with upper cervical spine tuberculosis.
methodsBetween June 2008 and January 2016, 17 patients (10 men and 7 women) with upper cervical spine tuberculosis underwent endoscopy-assisted anterior cervical debridement combined with posterior fixation and fusion. Anti-tuberculosis treatment was administered for 2-4 weeks preoperatively and 12-18 months postoperatively. The clinical and radiographic data of the patients were analyzed.
resultsThe operation was successfully completed in all patients. Neck pain and stiffness were relieved after the surgery in all patients. The mean operation time was 210.0 ± 21.2 min, and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 364.7 ± 49.6 mL. The mean follow-up duration was 68.1 ± 6.7 months. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate returned to normal by 3 months postoperatively. Visual analog scale scores for neck pain were significantly lower postoperatively than preoperatively. All patients had significant postoperative neurological improvement. Patient-reported outcomes, as measured using the Kirkaldy-Willis criteria, were as follows: excellent, 12 patients; good, 4 patients; fair, 1 patient; and poor, 0 patients. Bone fusion was achieved at 10.9 ± 1.9 months after the surgery; no cases of instrument loosening or fracture occurred.
conclusionEndoscopy-assisted anterior cervical debridement combined with posterior fixation and fusion is a feasible and effective surgical method for the treatment of upper cervical spine tuberculosis. It can be used to restore upper cervical spine stability and facilitate spinal healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.