Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35135494›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2022

Positive H. pylori status predicts better prognosis of non-cardiac gastric cancer patients: results from cohort study and meta-analysis.

Zhifang Jia, Min Zheng, Jing Jiang, Donghui Cao, Yanhua Wu, Yuzheng Zhang, Yingli Fu, Xueyuan Cao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Detection ofJournal of imaging · 2025
    Article
  4. Co-Occurrence ofBiomedicines · 2025
    Review
  5. Relationship betweenWorld journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. International journal of biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Effects ofFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhifang Jia *Division of Clinical Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Min Zheng *Division of Clinical Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Jing JiangDivision of Clinical Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Donghui CaoDivision of Clinical Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yanhua WuDivision of Clinical Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yuzheng ZhangDivision of Clinical Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yingli FuDivision of Clinical Research, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Xueyuan CaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. jd3d2ub@jlu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1982-1672

Funding

jilin scientific and technological development program 20190201093JCjilin scientific and technological development program 20210101436JCnational natural science foundation of china 81673145national natural science foundation of china 81703293national natural science foundation of china 81874279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious researches have associated Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) with a prognosis of gastric cancer (GC), however, without a concert conclusion. This study aimed to study this issue further by a prospective cohort study and a meta-analysis.

methodsHistologically diagnosed gastric cancer (GC) patients were recruited into the primary prospective cohort study between January 2009 to December 2013. All the patients were followed-up periodically to record information on post-surgery therapy and overall survival status. The pre-surgery status of H. pylori was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. A meta-analysis was conducted after retrieving related researches in the databases of PubMed and Embase up to April 2020. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were summarized to validate the relationship between H. pylori infection and the survival time of GC patients. I

resultsA total of 743 GC patients with radical tumorectomy were included prospectively and 516 (69.4%) were positive on H. pylori. H. pylori-positive patients tended to survive longer than -negative ones (HR 0.92, 95%CI: 0.74-1.15), though the tendency was not statistically significant. Cohort studies on the prognosis of GC were retrieved comprehensively by assessing the full-text and 59 published studies, together with the result of our study, were included in the further meta-analysis. The summarized results related the positive status of H. pylori to better overall survival (HR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.72-0.90) and disease-free survival (HR 0.83, 95%CI: 0.67-0.99). Results from subgroup analyses indicated that the pooled magnitude of this association was relatively lower in studies not referring to H. pylori in title and abstract.

conclusionsIn conclusion, gastric cancer patients with H. pylori have a better prognosis than patients of H. pylori negative. More stringent surveillance strategies may be necessary for patients with H. pylori negative at cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Helicobacter pyloriAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHelicobacter InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsGastric cancerH. pyloriMeta-analysisPrognosisPrognostic study

Identifiers

PMID35135494
PMCPMC8822753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.