ArticleBMC genomics2022
Evaluation of methods to detect circular RNAs from single-end RNA-sequencing data.
Article in BMC genomics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Landscape of circular RNAs in acute myeloid leukemia and their clinical significance.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Identification and characterization of tissue- and stress-specific circular RNAs (circRNAs) of tea to generate the largest tea circRNAs data repository.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Five things to consider before proposing that a circular RNA is a viroid.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- Chromosome-scale genome assembly reveals how repeat elements shape non-coding RNA landscapes active during newt limb regeneration.Cell genomics · 2025Article
- Classification of and detection techniques for RNAi-induced effects in GM plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Comprehensive circular RNA profiling in various sheep tissues.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Investigation of the Circular Transcriptome in Alzheimer's Disease Brain.Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN · 2024Article
- Circular RNAs and their roles in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.Respiratory research · 2024Review
- Interplay of circular RNAs in gastric cancer - a systematic review.Frontiers in systems biology · 2024Review
- Diagnostic and therapeutic potential of circular RNA in brain tumors.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCircular RNA (circRNA), a class of RNA molecule with a loop structure, has recently attracted researchers due to its diverse biological functions and potential biomarkers of human diseases. Most of the current circRNA detection methods from RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) data utilize the mapping information of paired-end (PE) reads to eliminate false positives. However, much of the practical RNA-Seq data such as cross-linking immunoprecipitation sequencing (CLIP-Seq) data usually contain single-end (SE) reads. It is not clear how well these tools perform on SE RNA-Seq data.
resultsIn this study, we present a systematic evaluation of six advanced RNA-based methods and two CLIP-Seq based methods for detecting circRNAs from SE RNA-Seq data. The performances of the methods are rigorously assessed based on precision, sensitivity, F1 score, and true discovery rate. We investigate the impacts of read length, false positive ratio, sequencing depth and PE mapping information on the performances of the methods using simulated SE RNA-Seq simulated datasets. The real datasets used in this study consist of four experimental RNA-Seq datasets with ≥100bp read length and 124 CLIP-Seq samples from 45 studies that contain mostly short-read (≤50bp) RNA-Seq data. The simulation study shows that the sensitivities of most of the methods can be improved by increasing either read length or sequencing depth, and that the levels of false positive rates significantly affect the precision of all methods. Furthermore, the PE mapping information can improve the method's precision but can not always guarantee the increase of F1 score. Overall, no method is dominant for all SE RNA-Seq data. The RNA-based methods perform better for the long-read datasets but are worse for the short-read datasets. In contrast, the CLIP-Seq based methods outperform the RNA-Seq based methods for all the short-read samples. Combining the results of these methods can significantly improve precision in the CLIP-Seq data.
conclusionsThe results provide a systematic evaluation of circRNA detection methods on SE RNA-Seq data that would facilitate researchers' strategies in circRNA analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.