Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35135472›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2022

Genetic analysis of disease resilience of wean-to-finish pigs under a natural disease challenge model using reaction norms.

Jian Cheng, KyuSang Lim, Austin M Putz, Anna Wolc, John C S Harding, Michael K Dyck, Frederic Fortin, Graham S Plastow, PigGen Canada, Jack C M Dekkers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jian ChengDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
KyuSang LimDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Austin M PutzDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
Anna WolcDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.
John C S HardingDepartment of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5B4, Canada.
Michael K DyckDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
Frederic FortinCentre de Développement du Porc du Québec Inc., Québec City, G1V 4M6, Canada.
Graham S PlastowDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.
PigGen Canada
Jack C M DekkersDepartment of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA. jdekkers@iastate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1557-7577

Funding

national institute of food and agriculture 2017-67007-26144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisease resilience is the ability to maintain performance across environments with different disease challenge loads (CL). A reaction norm describes the phenotypes that a genotype can produce across a range of environments and can be implemented using random regression models. The objectives of this study were to: (1) develop measures of CL using growth rate and clinical disease data recorded under a natural polymicrobial disease challenge model; and (2) quantify genetic variation in disease resilience using reaction norm models.

methodsDifferent CL were derived from contemporary group effect estimates for average daily gain (ADG) and clinical disease phenotypes, including medical treatment rate (TRT), mortality rate, and subjective health scores. Resulting CL were then used as environmental covariates in reaction norm analyses of ADG and TRT in the challenge nursery and finisher, and compared using model loglikelihoods and estimates of genetic variance associated with CL. Linear and cubic spline reaction norm models were compared based on goodness-of-fit and with multi-variate analyses, for which phenotypes were separated into three traits based on low, medium, or high CL.

resultsBased on model likelihoods and estimates of genetic variance explained by the reaction norm, the best CL for ADG in the nursery was based on early ADG in the finisher, while the CL derived from clinical disease traits across the nursery and finisher was best for ADG in the finisher and for TRT in the nursery and across the nursery and finisher. With increasing CL, estimates of heritability for nursery and finisher ADG initially decreased, then increased, while estimates for TRT generally increased with CL. Genetic correlations for ADG and TRT were low between high versus low CL, but high for close CL. Linear reaction norm models fitted the data significantly better than the standard genetic model without genetic slopes, while the cubic spline model fitted the data significantly better than the linear reaction norm model for most traits. Reaction norm models also fitted the data better than multi-variate models.

conclusionsReaction norm models identified genotype-by-environment interactions related to disease CL. Results can be used to select more resilient animals across different levels of CL, high-performance animals at a given CL, or a combination of these.

Indexed as

WeaningAnimalsGenotypePhenotypeSwine

Identifiers

PMID35135472
PMCPMC8822643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.