Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35135408›Full record

ArticlePublic understanding of science (Bristol, England)2022

Psychological underpinnings of pandemic denial - patterns of disagreement with scientific experts in the German public during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Tobias Rothmund, Fahima Farkhari, Carolin-Theresa Ziemer, Flávio Azevedo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public understanding of science (Bristol, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Personal Experience of COVID-19 Disease on Recreational Anglers' Attitudes and Behaviors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Moral Disengagement, Dark Triad and Face Mask Wearing during the COVID-19 Pandemic.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tobias RothmundFriedrich-Schiller University Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2979-5129
Fahima FarkhariFriedrich-Schiller University Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8484-5128
Carolin-Theresa ZiemerORCID 0000-0002-0794-7702
Flávio AzevedoFriedrich-Schiller University Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9000-8513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We investigated pandemic denial in the general public in Germany after the first wave of COVID-19 in May 2020. Using latent class analysis, we compared patterns of disagreement with claims about (a) the origin, spread, or infectiousness of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and (b) the personal risk from COVID-19 between scientific laypersons (

Indexed as

COVID-19Social MediaDissent and DisputesHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2conspiracy beliefsCOVID-19science communicationscience denialsocial media

Identifiers

PMID35135408
PMCPMC9096582
OpenAlexW3216708689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.