Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35135351›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2022

Characterizing ontogeny of quantity discrimination in zebrafish.

Eva Sheardown, Jose Vicente Torres-Perez, Sofia Anagianni, Scott E Fraser, Giorgio Vallortigara, Brian Butterworth, Maria Elena Miletto-Petrazzini, Caroline H Brennan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Neural Basis of Number Sense in Larval Zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Eva SheardownCentre for Developmental Neurobiology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, New Hunt's House, Guy's Campus, London SE1 1UL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1801-7025
Jose Vicente Torres-PerezDepartament de Biologia Cellular, Biologia Funcional i Antropologia física, Fac. de CC. Biològiques, Universitat de València, C/ Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot (València), Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6390-9690
Sofia AnagianniSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5784-582X
Scott E FraserMichelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5377-0223
Giorgio VallortigaraCenter for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8192-9062
Brian ButterworthUCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AZ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8201-3347
Maria Elena Miletto-PetrazziniSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5204-5863
Caroline H BrennanSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4169-4083
Queen Mary University of London · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversitat de València · ESUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Trento · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A sense of non-symbolic numerical magnitudes is widespread in the animal kingdom and has been documented in adult zebrafish. Here, we investigated the ontogeny of this ability using a group size preference (GSP) task in juvenile zebrafish. Fish showed GSP from 21 days post-fertilization and reliably chose the larger group when presented with discriminations of between 1 versus 3, 2 versus 5 and 2 versus 3 conspecifics but not 2 versus 4 conspecifics. When the ratio between the number of conspecifics in each group was maintained at 1 : 2, fish could discriminate between 1 versus 2 individuals and 3 versus 6, but again, not when given a choice between 2 versus 4 individuals. These findings are in agreement with studies in other species, suggesting the systems involved in quantity representation do not operate separately from other cognitive mechanisms. Rather they suggest quantity processing in fishes may be the result of an interplay between attentional, cognitive and memory-related mechanisms as in humans and other animals. Our results emphasize the potential of the use of zebrafish to explore the genetic and neural processes underlying the ontogeny and function of number cognition.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalZebrafishAnimalsCognitionnumerical cognitionontogenyquantity discriminationzebrafish

Identifiers

PMID35135351
PMCPMC8826302
OpenAlexW4210907434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.