Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35135342›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2023

An Opportunity for Improvement: Evaluation of Diabetes Technology Education Among Adult Endocrinology Training Programs.

Kathryn L Fantasia, Lindsay B Demers, Devin W Steenkamp, Katherine L Modzelewski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reducing Inequity in the Use of Automated Insulin Delivery Systems by Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Key Learnings From a Safety Net Diabetes Clinic Program.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn L FantasiaSection of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2949-9568
Lindsay B DemersDepartment of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8119-1002
Devin W SteenkampSection of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7132-3657
Katherine L ModzelewskiSection of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Nutrition, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3430-2504
Boston Medical Center · USBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite increases in continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and insulin pump use in adults with diabetes, there is room for expansion. Technology adoption may be influenced by the training environment and fellowship education. However, little is known about adult endocrinology trainee comfort with, understanding of, or methods by which trainees receive education about diabetes technology.

methodsMixed methods, sequential explanatory evaluation using survey and semi-structured interviews of endocrinology trainees and fellowship leadership in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited adult endocrinology fellowship programs to assess trainee and leadership comfort with, perceived knowledge of, and current methods for diabetes technology education.

resultsSeventy-seven respondents completed the survey. The majority of training programs have curricula for training on insulin pumps (74%) and CGM (75.3%); 52% of fellows felt curricula are adequate. First- and second-year fellows were more comfortable with CGM than insulin pump use. Only half of third-year fellows felt comfortable with starting insulin pump therapy or recommending insulin dose adjustments based on CGM rate of change arrows. Qualitative interviews identified the importance of both direct instruction and experiential learning in diabetes technology education.

conclusionsAlmost half of trainees feel that curricula for learning to use and manage insulin pumps and CGM are inadequate and feel uncomfortable with critical aspects of technology use, demonstrating the need for increased attention to trainee education in the use of diabetes technology. Based on a better understanding of current and preferred methods for instruction, this study provides direction for future development of initiatives to improve fellow education in this field.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusEndocrinologyInsulinsAdultBlood GlucoseCurriculumEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansBlood GlucoseInsulinscontinuous glucose monitordiabetes mellitusgraduate medical educationinsulin pump

Identifiers

PMID35135342
PMCPMC10563541
OpenAlexW4210924747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.