Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35134894›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2022

Screening for intimate partner violence during pregnancy: a test accuracy study.

Antonella Ludmila Zapata-Calvente, Jesús L Megías, Casilda Velasco, Africa Caño, Khalid S Khan, Leticia Rubio, Stella Martín-de-Las-Heras

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antonella Ludmila Zapata-CalventeBrain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6860-5485
Jesús L MegíasDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-3779
Casilda VelascoDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Jaen, Jaen, Spain.
Africa CañoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Khalid S KhanDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Leticia RubioDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8233-624X
Stella Martín-de-Las-HerasDepartment of Forensic Medicine, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ESUniversidad de Jaén · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a serious health problem that affects pregnancy more frequently than other obstetric complications usually evaluated in antenatal visits. We aimed to estimate the accuracy of the Women Abuse Screening Tool-Short (WAST-Short) and the Abuse Assessment Screen (AAS) for the detection of IPV during and before pregnancy.

methodsConsecutive eligible mothers in 21 public primary health antenatal care centres in Andalusia (Spain) who received antenatal care and gave birth during January 2017-March 2019, had IPV data gathered by trained midwives in the first and third pregnancy trimesters. The index tests were WAST-Short (score range 0-2; cut-off 2) and AAS (score range 0-1; cut-off 1). The reference standard was World Health Organization (WHO) IPV questionnaire. Area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for test performance to capture IPV during and before pregnancy, and compared using paired samples analysis.

resultsAccording to the reference standard, 9.5% (47/495) and 19.4% (111/571) women suffered IPV during and before pregnancy, respectively. For capturing IPV during pregnancy in the third trimester, the WAST-Short (AUC 0.73, 95% CI 0.63, 0.81), performed better than AAS (AUC 0.57, 95% CI 0.47, 0.66, P = 0.0001). For capturing IPV before pregnancy in the first trimester, there was no significant difference between the WAST-Short (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.62, 0.74) and the AAS (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.62, 0.74, P = 0.99).

conclusionsThe WAST-Short could be useful to screen IPV during pregnancy in antenatal visits.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceSpouse AbuseFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareSpainSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35134894
PMCPMC9159325
OpenAlexW4212842153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.