Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35134815›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Satiety Associated with Calorie Restriction and Time-Restricted Feeding: Central Neuroendocrine Integration.

Debra K M Tacad, Ashley P Tovar, Christine E Richardson, William F Horn, Nancy L Keim, Giri P Krishnan, Sridevi Krishnan

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Debra K M TacadObesity and Metabolism Research Unit, USDA-Western Human Nutrition Research Center, Davis, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7383-1564
Ashley P TovarDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Christine E RichardsonDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
William F HornObesity and Metabolism Research Unit, USDA-Western Human Nutrition Research Center, Davis, CA, USA.
Nancy L KeimObesity and Metabolism Research Unit, USDA-Western Human Nutrition Research Center, Davis, CA, USA.
Giri P KrishnanDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sridevi KrishnanDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Western Human Nutrition Research Center · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review focuses on summarizing current knowledge on how time-restricted feeding (TRF) and continuous caloric restriction (CR) affect central neuroendocrine systems involved in regulating satiety. Several interconnected regions of the hypothalamus, brainstem, and cortical areas of the brain are involved in the regulation of satiety. Following CR and TRF, the increase in hunger and reduction in satiety signals of the melanocortin system [neuropeptide Y (NPY), proopiomelanocortin (POMC), and agouti-related peptide (AgRP)] appear similar between CR and TRF protocols, as do the dopaminergic responses in the mesocorticolimbic circuit. However, ghrelin and leptin signaling via the melanocortin system appears to improve energy balance signals and reduce hyperphagia following TRF, which has not been reported in CR. In addition to satiety systems, CR and TRF also influence circadian rhythms. CR influences the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) or the primary circadian clock as seen by increased clock gene expression. In contrast, TRF appears to affect both the SCN and the peripheral clocks, as seen by phasic changes in the non-SCN (potentially the elusive food entrainable oscillator) and metabolic clocks. The peripheral clocks are influenced by the primary circadian clock but are also entrained by food timing, sleep timing, and other lifestyle parameters, which can supersede the metabolic processes that are regulated by the primary circadian clock. Taken together, TRF influences hunger/satiety, energy balance systems, and circadian rhythms, suggesting a role for adherence to CR in the long run if implemented using the TRF approach. However, these suggestions are based on only a few studies, and future investigations that use standardized protocols for the evaluation of the effect of these diet patterns (time, duration, meal composition, sufficiently powered) are necessary to verify these preliminary observations.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionFeeding BehaviorCircadian RhythmHumansMelanocortinsNeurosecretory SystemsSuprachiasmatic NucleusMelanocortinscalorie restrictioncircadian rhythmshypothalamuslight-entrainable oscillatorperipheral oscillatorssatietytime-restricted feeding

Identifiers

PMID35134815
PMCPMC9156369
OpenAlexW4210375727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.