Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35134247›Full record

ReviewPlant physiology2022

CRISPR-Cas-mediated transcriptional control and epi-mutagenesis.

Jason Gardiner, Basudev Ghoshal, Ming Wang, Steven E Jacobsen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Genome Editing by Grafting.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Epigenetics in the modern era of crop improvements.Science China. Life sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Histone Maps inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Engineering custom morpho- and chemotypes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Review
  13. Misexpression Approaches for the Manipulation of Flower Development.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason GardinerDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9387-6383
Basudev GhoshalDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1387-0139
Ming WangDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1223-3421
Steven E JacobsenDepartment of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9483-138X
University of California, Los Angeles · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tools for sequence-specific DNA binding have opened the door to new approaches in investigating fundamental questions in biology and crop development. While there are several platforms to choose from, many of the recent advances in sequence-specific targeting tools are focused on developing Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats- CRISPR Associated (CRISPR-Cas)-based systems. Using a catalytically inactive Cas protein (dCas), this system can act as a vector for different modular catalytic domains (effector domains) to control a gene's expression or alter epigenetic marks such as DNA methylation. Recent trends in developing CRISPR-dCas systems include creating versions that can target multiple copies of effector domains to a single site, targeting epigenetic changes that, in some cases, can be inherited to the next generation in the absence of the targeting construct, and combining effector domains and targeting strategies to create synergies that increase the functionality or efficiency of the system. This review summarizes and compares DNA targeting technologies, the effector domains used to target transcriptional control and epi-mutagenesis, and the different CRISPR-dCas systems used in plants.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsMutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID35134247
PMCPMC8968285
OpenAlexW4210680332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.