Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35134165›Full record

Observational studyClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2022

Multicenter Prospective Study of Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Invasive Candidiasis in Children and Adolescents.

Brian T Fisher, Craig L K Boge, Rui Xiao, Sydney Shuster, Dawn Chin-Quee, John Allen, Shareef Shaheen, Randall Hayden, Sri Suganda, Theoklis E Zaoutis and 22 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02220790 (Fungal Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Response to Therapy for Pediatric), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02220790 completednot on this map

Fungal Biomarkers for Diagnosis and Response to Therapy for Pediatric

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorDuke UniversityRan2015 to 2020Enrolled515ConditionsInvasive Candidiasis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Brazilian guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in adults and children.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Quantitatively detectingFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Invasive Candidiasis in Children: Challenges Remain.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 20 institutions in 3 countries.

Brian T FisherChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Craig L K BogeChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rui XiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Sydney ShusterChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dawn Chin-QueeDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
John AllenDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Shareef ShaheenDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Randall HaydenDepartment of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Sri SugandaDepartment of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Theoklis E ZaoutisChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Yeh Chung ChangDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Dwight E YinChildren's Mercy and University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Anna R HupplerMedical College of Wisconsin and Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Lara Danziger-IsakovCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
William J MullerNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Emmanuel RoilidesInfectious Disease Unit, 3rd Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Aristotle University and Hippokration Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
José RomeroArkansas Children's Hospital Research Institute, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Paul K SueUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
David BermanJohn Hopkins All Children's Hospital, St Petersburg, Florida, USA.
Rachel L WattierUniversity of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Natasha HalasaVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Alice PongUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA.
Gabriela MaronSt Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Pere Soler-PalacinHospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Susan C HuttoUniversity of Alabama, Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Blanca E GonzalezCleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Christine M SalvatoreWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Sujatha RajanCohen Children's Medical Center of New York, New Hyde Park, New York, USA.
Michael GreenUPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Elizabeth Doby KnackstedtUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USAand.
Sarmistha B HaugerDell Children's Medical Center, Austin, Texas, USA.
William J SteinbachDuke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke University · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USArkansas Children's Hospital · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USChildren's Hospital of Wisconsin · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USCleveland Clinic · USCohen Children's Medical Center · USDell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas · USHippocration General Hospital · GRJohns Hopkins University · USNorthwestern University · USSisters of Mercy Health System · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Training GrantT32AI055435 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LAUTENBACH, EBBING · 2003 to 2023
$6.9M
Fungal biomarkers for diagnosis and response to therapy for pediatric candidemiaR01HD081044 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FISHER, BRIAN T, STEINBACH, WILLIAM J · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI055435NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of invasive candidiasis (IC) relies on insensitive cultures; the relative utility of fungal biomarkers in children is unclear.

methodsThis multinational observational cohort study enrolled patients aged >120 days and <18 years with concern for IC from 1 January 2015 to 26 September 2019 at 25 centers. Blood collected at onset of symptoms was tested using T2Candida, Fungitell (1→3)-β-D-glucan, Platelia Candida Antigen (Ag) Plus, and Platelia Candida Antibody (Ab) Plus assays. Operating characteristics were determined for each biomarker, and assays meeting a defined threshold considered in combination. Sterile site cultures were the reference standard.

resultsFive hundred participants were enrolled at 22 centers in 3 countries, and IC was diagnosed in 13 (2.6%). Thirteen additional blood specimens were collected and successfully spiked with Candida species, to achieve a 5.0% event rate. Valid T2Candida, Fungitell, Platelia Candida Ag Plus, and Platelia Candida Ab Plus assay results were available for 438, 467, 473, and 473 specimens, respectively. Operating characteristics for T2Candida were most optimal for detecting IC due to any Candida species, with results as follows: sensitivity, 80.0% (95% confidence interval, 59.3%-93.2%), specificity 97.1% (95.0%-98.5%), positive predictive value, 62.5% (43.7%-78.9%), and negative predictive value, 98.8% (97.2%-99.6%). Only T2Candida and Platelia Candida Ag Plus assays met the threshold for combination testing. Positive result for either yielded the following results: sensitivity, 86.4% (95% confidence interval, 65.1%- 97.1%); specificity, 94.7% (92.0%-96.7%); positive predictive value, 47.5% (31.5%-63.9%); and negative predictive value, 99.2% (97.7%-99.8%).

conclusionsT2Candida alone or in combination with Platelia Candida Ag Plus may be beneficial for rapid detection of Candida species in children with concern for IC. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02220790.

Indexed as

Candidiasis, InvasiveAdolescentAntigens, FungalBiomarkersCandidaCandidiasisChildHumansProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, FungalBiomarkersbiomarkersinvasive candidiasisPediatrics

Identifiers

PMID35134165
PMCPMC9890499
OpenAlexW4210792114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.