Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35134072›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Sound source localization patterns and bilateral cochlear implants: Age at onset of deafness effects.

Sean R Anderson, Rachael Jocewicz, Alan Kan, Jun Zhu, ShengLi Tzeng, Ruth Y Litovsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparing Bilateral and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Recipients in a Novel Speech-in-Noise and Localization Task.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Research status and progress of bilateral cochlear implantation].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sean R AndersonWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1638-0197
Rachael JocewiczDepartment of Audiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Alan KanSchool of Engineering, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6033-0958
Jun ZhuDepartment of Statistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
ShengLi TzengDepartment of Mathematics, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Ruth Y LitovskyWaisman Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.

Funding

WISCONSIN CENTER ON MENTAL RETARDATION: CORE SUPPORTP30HD003352 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DAVIDSON, RICHARD J · 1985 to 2015
$25.2M
Directional Hearing in Complex Auditory EnvironmentsR01DC003083 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LITOVSKY, RUTH Y · 2004 to 2020
$7.4M
Restoring binaural hearing abilities to bilateral cochlear implant usersR03DC015321 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KAN, ALAN HO LUN · 2016 to 2018
$459k
NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD003352NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003083NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC015321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to determine a sound's location is critical in everyday life. However, sound source localization is severely compromised for patients with hearing loss who receive bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs). Several patient factors relate to poorer performance in listeners with BiCIs, associated with auditory deprivation, experience, and age. Critically, characteristic errors are made by patients with BiCIs (e.g., medial responses at lateral target locations), and the relationship between patient factors and the type of errors made by patients has seldom been investigated across individuals. In the present study, several different types of analysis were used to understand localization errors and their relationship with patient-dependent factors (selected based on their robustness of prediction). Binaural hearing experience is required for developing accurate localization skills, auditory deprivation is associated with degradation of the auditory periphery, and aging leads to poorer temporal resolution. Therefore, it was hypothesized that earlier onsets of deafness would be associated with poorer localization acuity and longer periods without BiCI stimulation or older age would lead to greater amounts of variability in localization responses. A novel machine learning approach was introduced to characterize the types of errors made by listeners with BiCIs, making them simple to interpret and generalizable to everyday experience. Sound localization performance was measured in 48 listeners with BiCIs using pink noise trains presented in free-field. Our results suggest that older age at testing and earlier onset of deafness are associated with greater average error, particularly for sound sources near the center of the head, consistent with previous research. The machine learning analysis revealed that variability of localization responses tended to be greater for individuals with earlier compared to later onsets of deafness. These results suggest that early bilateral hearing is essential for best sound source localization outcomes in listeners with BiCIs.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAge of OnsetAuditory PerceptionCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsCuesDeafnessFemaleHearingHearing LossHearing Loss, BilateralHearing Tests

Identifiers

PMID35134072
PMCPMC8824335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.