ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Inference of trajectory presence by tree dimension and subset specificity by subtree cover.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cutting-Edge AI Technologies Meet Precision Medicine to Improve Cancer Care.Biomolecules · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The complexity of biological processes such as cell differentiation is reflected in dynamic transitions between cellular states. Trajectory inference arranges the states into a progression using methodologies propelled by single-cell biology. However, current methods, all returning a best trajectory, do not adequately assess statistical significance of noisy patterns, leading to uncertainty in inferred trajectories. We introduce a tree dimension test for trajectory presence in multivariate data by a dimension measure of Euclidean minimum spanning tree, a test statistic, and a null distribution. Computable in linear time to tree size, the tree dimension measure summarizes the extent of branching more effectively than globally insensitive number of leaves or tree diameter indifferent to secondary branches. The test statistic quantifies trajectory presence and its null distribution is estimated under the null hypothesis of no trajectory in data. On simulated and real single-cell datasets, the test outperformed the intuitive number of leaves and tree diameter statistics. Next, we developed a measure for the tissue specificity of the dynamics of a subset, based on the minimum subtree cover of the subset in a minimum spanning tree. We found that tissue specificity of pathway gene expression dynamics is conserved in human and mouse development: several signal transduction pathways including calcium and Wnt signaling are most tissue specific, while genetic information processing pathways such as ribosome and mismatch repair are least so. Neither the tree dimension test nor the subset specificity measure has any user parameter to tune. Our work opens a window to prioritize cellular dynamics and pathways in development and other multivariate dynamical systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.