Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35134037›Full record

SynthesisThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2022

The Impact of Interventions to Prevent Neonatal Healthcare-associated Infections in Low- and Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Felicity C Fitzgerald, Walter Zingg, Gwendoline Chimhini, Simbarashe Chimhuya, Stefanie Wittmann, Helen Brotherton, Ioana D Olaru, Samuel R Neal, Neal Russell, André Ricardo Araujo da Silva and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Carbapenem-resistantMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neonatal Invasive Candidiasis: Current Concepts.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Felicity C FitzgeraldFrom the Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Walter ZinggDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Gwendoline ChimhiniDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Zimbabwe.
Simbarashe ChimhuyaDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Zimbabwe.
Stefanie WittmannClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Helen BrothertonClinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Ioana D OlaruBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Samuel R NealFrom the Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Neal RussellPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's University of London, United Kingdom.
André Ricardo Araujo da SilvaLaboratory of Teaching of Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Infections, Federal Fluminense University, Brazil.
Mike SharlandPaediatric Infectious Diseases Research Group, St George's University of London, United Kingdom.
Anna C SealeFrom the Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Mark F CottonDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Division of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, and.
Susan CoffinChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Angela DramowskiDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, Division of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Stellenbosch University, South Africa, and.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBStellenbosch University · ZASt George's, University of London · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Zimbabwe · ZWGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Developing a care bundle for neonatal sepsis prevention in low-resource settingsK43TW010682 · FIC · STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY · PI DRAMOWSKI, ANGELA · 2017 to 2020
$454k
FIC NIH HHS K43 TW010682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinically suspected and laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections are frequent causes of morbidity and mortality during neonatal care. The most effective infection prevention and control interventions for neonates in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are unknown.

aimTo identify effective interventions in the prevention of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in LMIC neonatal units.

methodsMedline, PUBMED, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EMBASE and PsychInfo (January 2003 to October 2020) were searched to identify studies reporting single or bundled interventions for prevention of bloodstream infections in LMIC neonatal units.

resultsOur initial search identified 5206 articles; following application of filters, 27 publications met the inclusion and Integrated Quality Criteria for the Review of Multiple Study Designs assessment criteria and were summarized in the final analysis. No studies were carried out in low-income countries, only 1 in Sub-Saharan Africa and just 2 in multiple countries. Of the 18 single-intervention studies, most targeted skin (n = 4) and gastrointestinal mucosal integrity (n = 5). Whereas emollient therapy and lactoferrin achieved significant reductions in proven neonatal infection, glutamine and mixed probiotics showed no benefit. Chlorhexidine gluconate for cord care and kangaroo mother care reduced infection in individual single-center studies. Of the 9 studies evaluating bundles, most focused on prevention of device-associated infections and achieved significant reductions in catheter- and ventilator-associated infections.

conclusionsThere is a limited evidence base for the effectiveness of infection prevention and control interventions in LMIC neonatal units; bundled interventions targeting device-associated infections were most effective. More multisite studies with robust study designs are needed to inform infection prevention and control intervention strategies in low-resource neonatal units.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesInfant HealthCross InfectionEvidence-Based MedicineHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfection ControlPatient Care BundlesSepsis

Identifiers

PMID35134037
PMCPMC8815829
OpenAlexW4210946202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.