Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35134035›Full record

SynthesisThe Pediatric infectious disease journal2022

The Impact of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Children in Low- and Middle-income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Yara-Natalie Abo, Bridget Freyne, Diana Kululanga, Penelope A Bryant

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Pediatric infectious disease journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Yara-Natalie AboFrom the Infectious Diseases Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Blantyre, Malawi.
Bridget FreyneMalawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Research Programme.
Diana KululangaMalawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Research Programme.
Penelope A BryantFrom the Infectious Diseases Unit, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Blantyre, Malawi.
Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme · MWRoyal Children's Hospital · AUUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial stewardship (AMS) is central to the World Health Organisation Global Action Plan against antimicrobial resistance (AMR). If antibiotics are used without restraint, morbidity and mortality from AMR will continue to increase. In resource-rich settings, AMS can safely reduce antibiotic consumption. However, for children in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), the impact of different AMS interventions is unknown.

aimTo determine the impact of different AMS interventions on antibiotic use and clinical and microbiologic outcomes in children in LMIC.

methodsMEDLINE, Embase and PubMed were searched for studies of AMS interventions in pediatric population in LMIC settings. Controlled trials, controlled before-and-after studies and interrupted time series studies were included. Outcomes assessed were antibiotic use, multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) rates, clinical outcomes and cost.

resultsOf 1462 studies, 34 met inclusion criteria including a total population of >5,000,000 in 17 countries. Twenty were in inpatients, 2 in ED, 10 in OPD and 2 in both. Seven studies were randomized controlled trials. All types of interventions reported a positive impact on antibiotic prescribing. AMS bundles with education, and clinical decision tools appeared more effective than guidelines alone. AMS interventions resulted in significantly decreased clinical infections (4/4 studies) and clinical failure (2/2) and reduced MDRO colonization rate (4/4). There was no concomitant increase in mortality (4/4 studies) or length of stay (2/2).

conclusionMultiple effective strategies exist to reduce antibiotic consumption in LMIC. However, marked heterogeneity limit conclusions regarding the most effective approach, particularly regarding clinical outcomes. Overall, AMS strategies are important tools in the reduction of MDRO-related morbidity in children in LMIC.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision Support Systems, ClinicalGuidelines as TopicHealth PolicyHumansInfantOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Care BundlesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID35134035
PMCPMC8815847
OpenAlexW4210916772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.