Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35134006›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2022

Academic Orthopaedics As a Driver of Gender Diversity in the Orthopaedic Workforce: A Review of 4,519 Orthopaedic Faculty Members.

Benjamin Kuhns, Brittany E Haws, Shannon Kaupp, Michael D Maloney, Emily E Carmody, Sandeep Mannava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trends in female authorship of spine literature from 2002 to 2022.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Academic Orthopaedic Surgeon Financial Compensation in the United States: Trends and Distribution.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin KuhnsFrom the Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY (Dr. Kuhns, Dr. Haws, Dr. Maloney, Dr. Carmody, and Dr. Mannava), and Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY (Dr. Kaupp).ORCID 0000-0002-0593-481
Brittany E Haws
Shannon Kaupp
Michael D Maloney
Emily E Carmody

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to perform a cross-sectional analysis on the gender composition of practicing academic orthopaedic surgeons using three databases composed of clinical orthopaedic surgeons.

methodsA comprehensive database of 4,519 clinically active academic orthopaedic surgeons was compiled for this study after the review of publicly available data. The complied data set was evaluated alongside orthopaedic databases obtained from the 2017 Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) Faculty Administrative Management Online User System and the 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery (AAOS) Orthopaedic Practice in the US census representing the entire academy membership orthopaedic workforce. Gender status was obtained and compared between the three databases.

resultsOf the 4,519 clinically active academic orthopaedic surgeons analyzed, 435 (10%) were female compared with 19% for the AAMC faculty database and 7% for the AAOS members. Fourteen percent of women had achieved the rank of professor compared with 25% of the men (P < 0.001). AAMC faculty had a significantly higher percentages of female representation compared with both the clinical faculty (19% versus 10%; P < 0.001) and AAOS members (19% versus 7%; P < 0.001).

conclusionDespite multiple initiatives designed to increase diversity, the 7% female representation in the orthopaedic workforce identified in this study remains markedly lower than other medical and surgical specialties. A higher percentage of women were associated with the AAMC orthopaedic faculty compared with clinically active female surgeons at these institutions. Academic orthopaedic surgeons had greater female representation than the general orthopaedic workforce, highlighting the importance of training institutions at promoting gender equity.

Indexed as

Orthopedic ProceduresOrthopedicsPhysicians, WomenCross-Sectional StudiesFaculty, MedicalFemaleHumansMaleUnited StatesWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID35134006
PMCPMC8816373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.