Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35133633›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2022

Clinical and Laboratory Approach to Diagnose COVID-19 Using Machine Learning.

Krishnaraj Chadaga, Chinmay Chakraborty, Srikanth Prabhu, Shashikiran Umakanth, Vivekananda Bhat, Niranjana Sampathila

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Multi-objective deep learning framework for COVID-19 dataset problems.Journal of King Saud University. Science · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Krishnaraj ChadagaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9459-8423
Chinmay ChakrabortyDepartment of Electronics and Communication, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4385-0975
Srikanth PrabhuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. srikanth.prabhu@manipal.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3826-1084
Shashikiran UmakanthDepartment of Medicine, Dr. TMA Hospital, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5210-7457
Vivekananda BhatDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3411-9221
Niranjana SampathilaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3345-360X
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · INBirla Institute of Technology, Mesra · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), often known by the name COVID-19, is a type of acute respiratory syndrome that has had a significant influence on both economy and health infrastructure worldwide. This novel virus is diagnosed utilising a conventional method known as the RT-PCR (Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction) test. This approach, however, produces a lot of false-negative and erroneous outcomes. According to recent studies, COVID-19 can also be diagnosed using X-rays, CT scans, blood tests and cough sounds. In this article, we use blood tests and machine learning to predict the diagnosis of this deadly virus. We also present an extensive review of various existing machine-learning applications that diagnose COVID-19 from clinical and laboratory markers. Four different classifiers along with a technique called Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) were used for classification. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was utilized to calculate the gravity of each feature and it was found that eosinophils, monocytes, leukocytes and platelets were the most critical blood parameters that distinguished COVID-19 infection for our dataset. These classifiers can be utilized in conjunction with RT-PCR tests to improve sensitivity and in emergency situations such as a pandemic outbreak that might happen due to new strains of the virus. The positive results indicate the prospective use of an automated framework that could help clinicians and medical personnel diagnose and screen patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19HumansMachine LearningPandemicsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Artificial IntelligenceBlood testsCOVID-19Machine LearningRT-PCR

Identifiers

PMID35133633
PMCPMC8846962
OpenAlexW4210936308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.