Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35133632›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2022

Solution Oligonucleotide APIs: Regulatory Considerations.

Christian Wetter, Chris Chorley, Corrine Curtis, Nicole Del Canto, J Gair Ford, Jennifer Franklin, Cinzia Gazziola, Michael T Jones, Judy Lee, Arnold McAuley and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current CMC challenges in oligonucleotide API development: from IND to NDA.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Christian WetterPharma Technical Regulatory, F. Hoffmann - La Roche AG, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070, Basel, Switzerland. christian.wetter.cw1@roche.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8550-1362
Chris ChorleyGlobal Regulatory CMC, Biogen Idec Limited, Innovation House, 70 Norden Road, Maidenhead, SL6 4AY, Berkshire, UK.
Corrine CurtisGlobal Regulatory Affairs CMC, Janssen Research and Development, 965 Chesterbrook Blvd, Wayne, PA, 19087, USA.
Nicole Del CantoGlobal Regulatory CMC, Biogen, Inc., 225 Binney Street, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
J Gair FordCMC Regulatory Affairs, AstraZeneca, Charter Way, Macclesfield, SK10 2NA, UK.
Jennifer FranklinCMC Regulatory Affairs, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2855 Gazelle Court, Carlsbad, CA, 92010, USA.
Cinzia GazziolaPharma Technical Regulatory, F. Hoffmann - La Roche AG, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070, Basel, Switzerland.
Michael T JonesPharmecuetical Sciences, Pfizer Inc., 875 Chesterfield Parkway West, Chesterfield, MO, 63017, USA.
Judy LeeRegulatory Affairs CMC, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, One Health Plaza, East Hanover, NJ, 07936-1080, USA.
Arnold McAuleyProcess Development, Amgen, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
Florence C E SaraberCMC Leadership and Dossier Development and Operations, Janssen Biologics B.V., Einsteinweg 101, 2333 CB, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Audrey ScottDevelopment Projects - CMC Regulatory Affairs, GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Park Road, Ware, SG12 0DP, Hertfordshire, UK.
Janine TomProcess Development, Amgen, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, 91320, USA.
Amgen (United States) · USRoche (Switzerland) · CHAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBBiogen (United Kingdom) · GBBiogen (United States) · USGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBIonis Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USJanssen (Netherlands) · NLJanssen (United States) · USPfizer (United States) · USTris Pharma (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Manufacture of oligonucleotide active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) typically consists of solid-phase synthesis, deprotection and cleavage, purification and filtration, and isolation from aqueous solutions through lyophilization. In the first step of drug product manufacture, the API is dissolved in water again and excipients are added. While isolation of oligonucleotide APIs can be meaningful in many cases, there may be cases where keeping the API in solution provides benefit, and multiple technical aspects must be taken into account and balanced when determining the appropriate API form. A significant factor is whether an API in solution will contain additional components. While APIs in solution containing additional components (so-called formulated APIs) are well established for biological products, there are regulatory guidelines in place that represent hurdles for industry to using a formulated API approach for oligonucleotide drugs. The present communication outlines conditions where a formulated API approach can be chosen in compliance with existing guidelines. Relevant aspects pertaining to risk management, GMP standards, facility design, control strategies, and regulatory submission content are discussed. In addition, the authors propose that existing guidelines be modernized to enable the use of a formulated API approach for additional reasons than the ones described in the existing regulatory framework. The manuscript aims to promote a dialog with regulators in this field.

Indexed as

ExcipientsOligonucleotidesExcipientsOligonucleotidesAPI mixFormulated APIOligonucleotidesRegulatorySolution API

Identifiers

PMID35133632
PMCPMC8964572
OpenAlexW4210887800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.