ArticleJournal of applied genetics2022
Prediction ability for growth and maternal traits using SNP arrays based on different marker densities in Nellore cattle using the ssGBLUP.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Multi-Breed Genomic Prediction Models for Carcass and Reproductive Traits in Zebu Beef Cattle.Animal genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the prediction ability for growth and maternal traits using different low-density customized SNP arrays selected by informativeness and distribution of markers across the genome employing single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). Phenotypic records for adjusted weight at 210 and 450 days of age were utilized. A total of 945 animals were genotyped with high-density chip, and 267 individuals born after 2008 were selected as validation population. We evaluated 11 scenarios using five customized density arrays (40 k, 20 k, 10 k, 5 k and 2 k) and the HD array was used as desirable scenario. The GEBV predictions and BIF (Beef Improvement Federation) accuracy were obtained with BLUPF90 family programs. Linear regression was used to evaluate the prediction ability, inflation, and bias of GEBV of each customized array. An overestimation of partial GEBVs in contrast with complete GEBVs and increase of BIF accuracy with the density arrays diminished were observed. For all traits, the prediction ability was higher as the array density increased and it was similar with customized arrays higher than 10 k SNPs. Level of inflation was lower as the density array increased of and was higher for MW210 effect. The bias was susceptible to overestimation of GEBVs when the density customized arrays decreased. These results revealed that the BIF accuracy is sensible to overestimation using low-density customized arrays while the prediction ability with least 10,000 informative SNPs obtained from the Illumina BovineHD BeadChip shows accurate and less biased predictions. Low-density customized arrays under ssGBLUP method could be feasible and cost-effective in genomic selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.