Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35133537›Full record

ArticleCognitive processing2022

Cognitive control in number processing: new evidence from number compatibility effects in task-switching.

A Schliephake, J Bahnmueller, K Willmes, I Koch, K Moeller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive processing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A SchliephakeLeibniz-Institut Für Wissensmedien, Schleichstraße 6, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. a.schliephake@iwm-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-9232
J BahnmuellerCentre for Mathematical Cognition, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.
K WillmesDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
I KochInstitute of Psychology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
K MoellerCentre for Mathematical Cognition, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK.

Funding

deutsche forschungsgemeinschaft HU 2359/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of research suggests that basic numerical abilities such as number magnitude processing are influenced by cognitive control processes. So far, evidence for number processing being affected by cognitive control processes stems primarily from observed adaptations of numerical effects to stimulus set characteristics (e.g. order or ratio of specific stimulus types). Complementing previous research on adaptation to stimulus set characteristics as an index of influences of cognitive control, the present study employed a task-switching paradigm to examine how cognitive control processes influence number processing. Participants were presented with a two-digit number and had to either judge its parity or compare its magnitude to a standard depending on a preceding cue. We expected numerical congruency effects (i.e. the unit-decade compatibility effect for magnitude comparisons and the parity congruity effect for parity judgements) to be larger in switch trials, as persisting activation of the task set of the preceding trial should increase interference. In contrast to our expectations, both numerical congruity effects were reduced following task switches as compared to repetitions. This interaction of task-switching with numerical congruency effects suggests an influence of cognitive control on basic number processing in form of persisting inhibition of previously abandoned task sets, so that these exert less influence on current number processing demands.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalJudgmentCognitionHumansReaction TimeCognitive controlNumber processingParity congruity effectTask-switchingUnit-decade compatibility effect

Identifiers

PMID35133537
PMCPMC9072449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.