Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35133527›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2022

Role of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in the diagnosing of acute medial meniscus injury of knee joint.

Omid Ahmadi, Mehdi Motififard, Farhad Heydari, Keihan Golshani, Azita Azimi Meibody, Saeed Hatami

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Meniscal Injuries.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Omid AhmadiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Sofeh Ave, Keshvari Blvd., Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9089-6909
Mehdi MotififardDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2597-3063
Farhad HeydariDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Sofeh Ave, Keshvari Blvd., Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6296-0045
Keihan GolshaniDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Sofeh Ave, Keshvari Blvd., Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8567-5119
Azita Azimi MeibodyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Alzahra Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Sofeh Ave, Keshvari Blvd., Isfahan, Iran. azimimeibody@resident.mui.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9276-1074
Saeed HatamiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7849-7083
Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, musculoskeletal ultrasound has increasingly become the common method for diagnosis for many medical specialties. Therefore, the present study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic value of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) as a primary triage tool in the diagnosis of the acute medial meniscus injury of the knee. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe present cross-sectional study was performed on patients with a suspected medial meniscus injury of the knee in the emergency department (ED). After history taking and primary physical examination, radiographic imaging of the knee was done. If there was no fracture in the knee X-ray, the POCUS examination on the knee was carried out. All the patients were asked to refer to an orthopedic clinic 2 weeks after discharge from ED for the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) evaluation. Finally, the POCUS findings were compared with the MRI findings in diagnosing medial meniscus injury.

resultsFifty-five patients with a mean age of 35.48 ± 11.58 years were analyzed in the study (69.1% male). In comparison with MRI scan, the sensitivity and specificity of POCUS in the detection of medial meniscus injury were 85.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 54.0 to 98.9] and 65.7% [95% CI 42.2 to 85.7], respectively. Its positive and negative predictive values were 58.6% [95% CI 33.8 to 81.5] and 88.5% [95% CI 62.1 to 99.3], respectively. (Area under the ROC curve = 0.726, P value = 0.003).

conclusionThe present study demonstrated that POCUS can reasonably be applied in comparison with MRI to evaluate medial meniscus injury. POCUS is an effective initial diagnostic modality in patients with suspected medial meniscus injuries.

Indexed as

Acute medial meniscus injury of the kneeMagnetic resonance imagingUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID35133527
PMCPMC8825915
OpenAlexW4210933621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.