Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35133519›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2022

Efficacy assessment for low-level laser therapy in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia: a real-world study on 1383 patients.

Jun Qiu, Yanhua Yi, Linlang Jiang, Yong Miao, James Jia, Jian Zou, Zhiqi Hu

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia: Current Guidance and Unmet Needs.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jun QiuDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou AV, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Yanhua YiDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou AV, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Linlang JiangDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Xiangnan University, Chenzhou, China.
Yong MiaoDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou AV, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
James JiaDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou AV, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Jian ZouResearch Department, Slinph Technologies Co., Ltd, Room 1703, Block A, Bairuida Building, 4001 Ban Xue Gang Avenue, Long Gang District, Shenzhen, China. kevinzou@slinph.com.
Zhiqi HuDepartment of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, 1838 North Guangzhou AV, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. huzhiqidr163@i.smu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7827-6187
Nanfang Hospital · CNGuilin Medical University · CNKeihin (Japan) · JPXiangnan University · CN

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant 2019M652967Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province 81701929Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province 81772104Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province 81902013Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province 81971889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been a treatment modality by many androgenetic alopecia (AGA) patients in recent years. It remained unclear as to how long the treatment regime should be maintained, and which characteristics of patients should this be recommended. A real-world study was carried out with an FDA-cleared low-level laser helmet for 1383 patients. Ordinal logistic regression analysis with propensity score matching (PSM) was used to investigate the factors related to efficacy assessment. More than 80% of users were between 18 and 40 years old. The median use times were 133 for mild AGA patients and 142 for moderate-to-severe AGA patients, which equated to 38 weeks and 40 weeks, respectively. The overall clinical effectiveness was nearly 80%. PSM analysis revealed that gender (P = 0.002), use period (P = 0.068), scalp conditions with dandruff, rash, and itchy symptoms were associated with the grading of efficacy assessment. Male users (ordinal OR: 1.35, CI: (1.01, 1.79)); use for more than 180 times or use period for 1 year (ordinal OR: 1.40, CI: (1.11, 1.96)); and those with scalp dandruff (ordinal OR: 1.34, CI: (1.01, 1.87)), rash (ordinal OR: 1.47, CI: (1.04, 2.07)), and itchy symptoms (ordinal OR: 1.51, CI: (1.12, 2.03)) had better efficacy assessments. The recommended treatment regime with low-level laser helmet was more than 1 year or 180 use times. Male patients with dandruff, rash, and itchy symptoms in scalps tended to have a better efficacy assessment.

Indexed as

DandruffExanthemaLow-Level Light TherapyAdolescentAdultAlopeciaHumansMaleScalpTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAndrogenetic alopecia (AGA)Efficacy assessmentLow-level laser therapy (LLLT)Real-world study (RWS)

Identifiers

PMID35133519
PMCPMC9343305
OpenAlexW4210849623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.