ArticleUrolithiasis2022
Frequency and timing of emergency department visits and hospital admissions in stented patients following common stone procedures.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for readmission after ureteroscopy for stone disease: Modern single centre experience.BJUI compass · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions (HA) following urologic procedures are a concern for payors, providers, and patients. We seek to quantify ED visits and HA after urologic stone procedures. This is a retrospective cohort study using claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplement database. Adults with a urologic stone diagnosis and no history of stone procedure in prior 12 months who underwent stone procedures with ureteral stent codes between 2012 and 2017 were included. All-cause vs genitourinary (GU)-related ED visits and HA were evaluated during 30, 60, 90, and 120-day periods following the index urologic stone procedure. 88,047 patients were included in the analytic cohort. For inpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 10% vs 9% at 30 days and 19% vs 15% at 120 days. For outpatients, rate of all-cause vs GU-related ED visits was 9% vs 8% at 30 days and 15% vs 12% at 120 days. A similar trend was found when examining HA. Younger patients (18-44 years old) had higher rates of all-cause ED visits following inpatient index stone procedure (13% vs 10% at 30 days, p ≤ 0.0001). Twenty percent of patients have an ED visit or HA up to 120 days after having a stone procedure with most returning with GU-related complaint. Younger patients had the greatest burden among the study cohort. Further studies need to determine causation of these unplanned visits to guide appropriate intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.