Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35133481›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2022

Equivalent outcomes in nasal symptoms following microscopic or endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery: results from multi-centre, prospective study.

Charlie Osborne, Daniel Lewis, Ben Dixon, Carmela Caputo, Alison Magee, Kanna Gnanalingham, Yi Yuen Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Charlie Osborne *Department of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3259-8241
Daniel Lewis *Department of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Ben DixonDepartment of Ear, Nose & Throat, Head and Neck Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Carmela CaputoDepartment of Endocrinology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alison MageeKeyhole Neurosurgery, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kanna GnanalinghamDepartment of Neurosurgery, Manchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Yi Yuen WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. y.wang@keyholeneurosurgery.com.au.
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundT ranssphenoidal surgery (TSS) is the standard approach for resection of pituitary lesions. Historically, this has utilized the microscopic approach (mTSS); however, the past decade has seen widespread uptake of the endoscopic approach (eTSS). The purported benefits of this include improved visualization and illumination, resulting in improved surgical and endocrinological patient outcomes. It is also believed that eTSS results in fewer post-operative nasal symptoms compared to mTSS; however, few papers have directly compared these groups.

objectivesWe sought to compare nasal symptoms after endoscopic uninostril (eTSS-uni), endoscopic binostril (eTSS-bi) and microscopic endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (mTSS).

methodsThe General Nasal Patient Inventory (GNPI) was prospectively administered to 136 patients (71 non-functioning adenomas, 26 functioning adenomas, 39 other pathology) undergoing transsphenoidal surgery at multiple time points (pre-operatively; days 1, 3 and 7-14; months 1, 3 and 6 and 1 year post-operatively). All surgeries were performed by subspecialist pituitary surgeons in three subgroups - mTSS (25), eTSS-uni (74) and eTSS-bi (37). The total GNPI scores (0-135) and subscores for the 45 individual components were compared across three groups assessing for temporal and absolute changes.

resultsIrrespective of surgical approach used, GNPI scores were significantly higher on post-operative day 1 (p < 0.001) and day 3 (p ≤ 0.03) compared to pre-treatment baseline (mixed-effects model). By 1 month post-operatively, however, post-operative GNPI scores were no different from pre-treatment (p > 0.05, mixed-effects model). Whilst the eTSS-uni group demonstrated significantly lower GNPI scores at day 1 post-op compared to the mTSS group (p = 0.05) and eTSS-bi group (p < 0.001), there was no significant difference in post-operative scores between approaches beyond 1-2 weeks post-operatively. Similar results were obtained when the non-functioning tumour group was analysed separately.

conclusionsTranssphenoidal pituitary surgery is well tolerated. Post-operative nasal symptoms transiently worsen but ultimately improve compared to pre-operative baseline. Operative approach (microscopic, endoscopic uninostril or endoscopic binostril) only has a transient effect on severity of post-operative nasal symptoms.

Indexed as

AdenomaPituitary DiseasesPituitary NeoplasmsEndoscopyHumansPituitary GlandProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeEndoscopicMicroscopicNasal symptomsTranssphenoidal surgery

Identifiers

PMID35133481
PMCPMC9160117
OpenAlexW4210883314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.