ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2022
Effect of Diameter and Fenestration Area of the Liposuction Cannula on the Viability of the Adipocytes.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Cannula Fenestration Area on Fat Graft Architecture and Histology: A Double-Blind, Split-Body Clinical Trial.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Trial
- Article
- Elderly Women Have a Higher Survival Rate of Grafted Donor Fat than Do Young Women Under the Influence of Low Estrogen Conditions.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLoss of volume is perhaps the most frustrating problem of fat grafting. The process of fat grafting depends on different variables such as harvesting, processing, and injection techniques. Results between studies that evaluate the effect of the cannula size on fat graft survival have been controversial. However, the role of the fenestration area of the cannula has not been described.
methodsFour custom-made cannulas with a single fenestration were used for this study. Cannulas vary in diameter and area of the fenestration. Healthy patients seeking primary liposuction of the abdomen for aesthetic reasons were included. Lipoaspiration was performed in a clockwise pattern, and the order of the cannulas was rotated. Negative pressure was maintained at 0.8 atm at all times. Ten ml of fat, obtained from the suction tube, was poured into 20-ml conical centrifugal tubes for further processing. One gram of lipoaspirate was extracted from each sample, and acridine orange stain was added. Adipocytes were extracted, extended in a frotis, and observed by a histologist (masked fashion) under fluorescence microscopy. Viability was reported in percentages per sample.
resultsThe overall viability was 64.75% ± 18.58. The viability of the obtained samples ranged from 66.51± 20.66 % to 62.83 ± 18.1. In further analysis, comparing the viability according to the shaft diameter and fenestration area, there was no significant difference among groups.
conclusionsNeither the diameter of the cannula nor the size of the fenestrations are determining factors to affect the viability of the adipocytes. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.