ArticleJournal of vision2022
Abnormal perception of pattern-induced flicker colors in subjects with glaucoma.
Article in Journal of vision, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predictive networks generate motion-induced color illusions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pattern-induced flicker colors (PIFCs) are subjective colors that can be elicited with rotation of an achromatic stimulus such as the Benham disk. The perceptive mechanisms underlying PIFCs are not well-understood, but are thought to be generated primarily by retinal cell types which may be dysfunctional in glaucoma. Using a custom computer-based system, we tested PIFC perception across several Benham disk parameters, including the rates of acceleration and deceleration, rotational direction, and image contrast in both control and glaucoma subjects. We defined the Benham perception limit (BPL) during acceleration as the rotational speed at which PIFCs were first detected (Benham perception limit for acceleration) and the BPL during deceleration as the rotational speed at which PIFCs were extinguished (Benham perception limit for deceleration). In general, we found that glaucoma subjects perceived PIFCs less frequently than control subjects. For all subjects, we found that slower rates of acceleration and deceleration resulted in a lower Benham perception limit for acceleration and a higher Benham perception limit for deceleration, suggesting that PIFCs were both more easily detected and extinguished. Finally, subjects with glaucoma required increased rotational speeds during acceleration to detect PIFCs under certain conditions. Further study is needed to determine if these findings can be used to enhance clinical detection strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.