Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35133283›Full record

ArticleJournal of participatory medicine2022

Co-design of an Electronic Dashboard to Support the Coproduction of Care in Pediatric Rheumatic Disease: Human-Centered Design and Usability Testing.

Alysha Taxter, Lisa Johnson, Doreen Tabussi, Yukiko Kimura, Brittany Donaldson, Erica Lawson, Vincent Del Gaizo, Daniela Vitelli, Corinne Pinter, Aricca Van Citters and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of participatory medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Alysha Taxter *Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2429-116X
Lisa Johnson *Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7448-4931
Doreen Tabussi *Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9354-2997
Yukiko Kimura *Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7132-3390
Brittany Donaldson *Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3571-5885
Erica Lawson *University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9014-0175
Vincent Del Gaizo *Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA), Milwaukee, WI, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9319-8084
Daniela Vitelli *Parent Partner, Hasbrouck Heights, NJ, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7215-2332
Corinne PinterParent Partner, Sugar Land, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6966-7407
Aricca Van Citters *Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-5661
Eugene Nelson *Dartmouth College, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7991-7836
Tzielan Lee *Stanford Children's Health, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5505-8259
Dartmouth College · USHackensack University Medical Center · USChildhood Arthritis and Rheumatol­ogy Research Alliance · USHasbro (United States) · USHouston Methodist Sugar Land Hospital · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coproduction of care involves patients and families partnering with their clinicians and care teams, with the premise that each brings their own perspective, knowledge, and expertise, as well as their own values, goals, and preferences, to the partnership. Dashboards can display meaningful patient and clinical data to assess how a patient is doing and inform shared decision-making. Increasing communication between patients and care teams is particularly important for children with chronic conditions. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), the most common chronic pediatric rheumatic condition, is associated with increased pain, decreased function, and decreased quality of life.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to design a dashboard prototype for use in coproducing care in patients with JIA. We evaluated the use and needs of end users, obtained a consensus on the necessary dashboard data elements, and constructed display prototypes to inform meaningful discussions for coproduction.

methodsA human-centered design approach involving parents, patients, clinicians, and care team members was used to develop a dashboard to support the coproduction of care in 4 ambulatory pediatric rheumatology clinics. We engaged a multidisciplinary team (n=18) of patients, parents, clinicians, nurses, and staff during an in-person kick-off meeting followed by biweekly meetings. We also leveraged advisory panels. Teams mapped workflows and patient journeys, created personas, and developed dashboard sketches. The final dashboard components were determined via Delphi consensus voting. Low-tech dashboard testing was completed during clinic visits, and visual display prototypes were iterated by using the Plan-Do-Study-Act methodology. Patients and clinicians were surveyed regarding their experiences.

resultsTeams achieved consensus on what data mattered most at the point of care to support patients with JIA, families, and clinicians collaborating to make the best possible health care decisions. Notable themes included the right data in the right place at the right time, data in once for multiple purposes, patient and family self-management components, and the opportunity for education and increased transparency. A final set of 11 dashboard data elements was identified, including patient-reported outcomes, clinical data, and medications. Important design considerations featured the incorporation of real-time data, clearly labeled graphs, and vertical orientation to facilitate review and discussion. Prototype paper-testing with 36 patients and families yielded positive feedback, with 89% (8/9) to 100% (9/9) of parents (n=9) and 80% (8/10) to 90% (9/10) of clinicians (n=10) strongly agreeing or agreeing that the dashboard was useful during clinic discussions, helped to talk about what mattered most, and informed health care decision-making.

conclusionsWe developed a dashboard prototype that displays patient-reported and clinical data over time, along with medications that can be used during a clinic visit to support meaningful conversations and shared decision-making among patients with JIA, their families, and their clinicians and care teams.

Indexed as

coproductiondashboardfamily educationhuman-centered designJIAjuvenile arthritisjuvenile idiopathic arthritispatient centeredpatient communicationpatient educationpatient-reported outcomespediatric rheumatology

Identifiers

PMID35133283
PMCPMC9077505
OpenAlexW4210885875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.