Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35133281›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2022

Web-Based Interventions to Help Australian Adults Address Depression, Anxiety, Suicidal Ideation, and General Mental Well-being: Scoping Review.

Gemma Skaczkowski, Shannen van der Kruk, Sophie Loxton, Donna Hughes-Barton, Cate Howell, Deborah Turnbull, Neil Jensen, Matthew Smout, Kate Gunn

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Nomophobia (No Mobile Phone Phobia) and Psychological Health Issues among Young Adult Students.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gemma SkaczkowskiDepartment of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0715-3563
Shannen van der KrukDepartment of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5132-668X
Sophie LoxtonDepartment of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2358-6249
Donna Hughes-BartonDepartment of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4764-7528
Cate HowellAustralian Medical Placements Health Education and Training, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-5313
Deborah TurnbullSchool of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7116-7073
Neil JensenFreemasons Centre for Male Health and Wellbeing, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-6943
Matthew SmoutJustice and Society, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6952-6014
Kate GunnDepartment of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0837-6814
University of South Australia · AUFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health · AUTorrens University Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA large number of Australians experience mental health challenges at some point in their lives. However, in many parts of Australia, the wait times to see general practitioners and mental health professionals can be lengthy. With increasing internet use across Australia, web-based interventions may help increase access to timely mental health care. As a result, this is an area of increasing research interest, and the number of publicly available web-based interventions is growing. However, it can be confusing for clinicians and consumers to know the resources that are evidence-based and best meet their needs.

objectiveThis study aims to scope out the range of web-based mental health interventions that address depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, or general mental well-being and are freely available to Australian adults, along with their impact, acceptability, therapeutic approach, and key features.

methodsThe PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR [PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews]) guided the review process. Keywords for the search were depression, anxiety, suicide, and well-being. The search was conducted using Google as well as the key intervention databases Beacon, Head to Health, and e-Mental Health in Practice. Interventions were deemed eligible if they targeted depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, or general mental well-being (eg, resilience) in adults; and were web-based, written in English, interactive, free, and publicly available. They also had to be guided by an evidence-based therapeutic approach.

resultsOverall, 52 eligible programs were identified, of which 9 (17%) addressed depression, 15 (29%) addressed anxiety, 13 (25%) addressed general mental well-being, and 13 (25%) addressed multiple issues. Only 4% (2/52) addressed distress in the form of suicidal ideation. The most common therapeutic approach was cognitive behavioral therapy. Half of the programs guided users through exercises in a set sequence, and most programs enabled users to log in and complete the activities on their own without professional support. Just over half of the programs had been evaluated for their effectiveness in reducing symptoms, and 11% (6/52) were being evaluated at the time of writing. Program evaluation scores ranged from 44% to 100%, with a total average score of 85%.

conclusionsThere are numerous web-based programs for depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and general well-being, which are freely and publicly available in Australia. However, identified gaps include a lack of available web-based interventions for culturally and linguistically diverse populations and programs that use newer therapeutic approaches such as acceptance and commitment therapy and dialectical behavior therapy. Despite most programs included in this review being of good quality, clinicians and consumers should pay careful attention when selecting which program to recommend and use, as variations in the levels of acceptability and impact of publicly available programs do exist.

Indexed as

access to health careanxietydepressionmental healthsuicidetechnologyweb-based interventionswell-being

Identifiers

PMID35133281
PMCPMC8864526
OpenAlexW4210868923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.