Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35133216›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2022

Experiences of staff providing specialist palliative care during COVID-19: a multiple qualitative case study.

Andy Bradshaw, Lesley Dunleavy, Ian Garner, Nancy Preston, Sabrina Bajwah, Rachel Cripps, Lorna K Fraser, Matthew Maddocks, Mevhibe Hocaoglu, Fliss Em Murtagh and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Andy BradshawCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, SE5 9PJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1717-1546
Lesley DunleavyInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, LA1 4AT, UK.
Ian GarnerInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, LA1 4AT, UK.
Nancy PrestonInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, LA1 4AT, UK.
Sabrina BajwahCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
Rachel CrippsCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
Lorna K FraserMartin House Research Centre, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Matthew MaddocksCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
Mevhibe HocaogluCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
Fliss Em MurtaghWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1289-3726
Adejoke O OluyaseCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
Katherine E SleemanCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
Irene J HigginsonCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
Catherine WalsheInternational Observatory on End of Life Care, Lancaster University, LA1 4AT, UK.
King's College London · GBLancaster University · GBUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/V012908/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the experiences of, and impact on, staff working in palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

designQualitative multiple case study using semi-structured interviews between November 2020 and April 2021 as part of the CovPall study. Data were analysed using thematic framework analysis.

settingOrganisations providing specialist palliative services in any setting.

participantsStaff working in specialist palliative care, purposefully sampled by the criteria of role, care setting and COVID-19 experience.

main outcome measuresExperiences of working in palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

resultsFive cases and 24 participants were recruited (n = 12 nurses, 4 clinical managers, 4 doctors, 2 senior managers, 1 healthcare assistant, 1 allied healthcare professional). Central themes demonstrate how infection control constraints prohibited and diluted participants' ability to provide care that reflected their core values, resulting in experiences of moral distress. Despite organisational, team and individual support strategies, continually managing these constraints led to a 'crescendo effect' in which the impacts of moral distress accumulated over time, sometimes leading to burnout. Solidarity with colleagues and making a valued contribution provided 'moral comfort' for some.

conclusionsThis study provides a unique insight into why and how healthcare staff have experienced moral distress during the pandemic, and how organisations have responded. Despite their experience of dealing with death and dying, the mental health and well-being of palliative care staff was affected by the pandemic. Organisational, structural and policy changes are urgently required to mitigate and manage these impacts.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health PersonnelHumansPalliative CarePandemicsQualitative Researchhospicepalliative careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35133216
PMCPMC9158238
OpenAlexW4226033045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.