ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2022
Optimization of Cavity-Based Negative Images to Boost Docking Enrichment in Virtual Screening.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building shape-focused pharmacophore models for effective docking screening.Journal of cheminformatics · 2024Article
- Virtual Screening Strategy to Identify Retinoic Acid-Related Orphan Receptor γt Modulators.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Ligand-Enhanced Negative Images Optimized for Docking Rescoring.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Molecular docking is a key in silico method used routinely in modern drug discovery projects. Although docking provides high-quality ligand binding predictions, it regularly fails to separate the active compounds from the inactive ones. In negative image-based rescoring (R-NiB), the shape/electrostatic potential (ESP) of docking poses is compared to the negative image of the protein's ligand binding cavity. While R-NiB often improves the docking yield considerably, the cavity-based models do not reach their full potential without expert editing. Accordingly, a greedy search-driven methodology, brute force negative image-based optimization (BR-NiB), is presented for optimizing the models via iterative editing and benchmarking. Thorough and unbiased training, testing and stringent validation with a multitude of drug targets, and alternative docking software show that BR-NiB ensures excellent docking efficacy. BR-NiB can be considered as a new type of shape-focused pharmacophore modeling, where the optimized models contain only the most vital cavity information needed for effectively filtering docked actives from the inactive or decoy compounds. Finally, the BR-NiB code for performing the automated optimization is provided free-of-charge under MIT license via GitHub (https://github.com/jvlehtonen/brutenib) for boosting the success rates of docking-based virtual screening campaigns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.